On Mon, 16 May 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
Did I miss some development or why exactly does cypherpunks care
about a release candidate of libevent (or Wolfram's New Kind of
Science for that matter)? Was I frozen for that long?
Well, lets see. I suppose I could answer either way: Yes, we
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 15:07 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
This is the sixth release candidate for the 0.1.0.x series. This is an
Did I miss some development or why exactly does cypherpunks care
about a release candidate of libevent (or Wolfram's New Kind of
Science for that matter)? Was I
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.16.1924 +0200]:
Interesting... this is not how I remembered it.
... I had been subscribed to the moderated minder.net list in the
past... this explains :)
Again, sorry, also for the noise.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Natalia wrote:
QUIT
More specific please? Quit diddling my data? Quit typing so loud after
10:00pm? Quit my job???
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious
Pawe3 Krawczyk wrote:
In this paper we study the security of such ciphers under an
additional hypothesis: the S-box can be described by an overdefined
system of algebraic equations (true with probability 1). We show that
this hypothesis is true for both Serpent (due to a small size of
