On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 01:50 PM 03/20/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The other one we hear is You should be ashamed which brings a
chorus of
No, we're proud or Have you forgotten about Sept. 11th? We did
have some
older fellow stopped at the
At 02:03 PM 3/20/03 +, Ken Brown wrote:
Of all the places in the world you ought not to go if you want to not be
shot at, a war with 8 sides (Residual Lebanese govt. vs Palestinians vs.
Israel vs Islamist Shia militias vs. non-Islamist Shia militias vs.
Sunni militias vs Maronite militias vs
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Tim Meehan wrote:
Vancouver is nice, but the economy sucks (except if you're growing). Toronto has
an okay economy but too many yuppies and climbers (and crappy pot). Montreal is
the best, but you're better off if you speak Freedom -- and like hash.
Yeah, I can speak
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 07:52:30PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Given that their platform, and Ralph Nader, calls for 90% tax rates for
those with excessive wealth or income, they're far more statist than
anyone else out there.
Yep -- their platform is extreme. Like I said, I'm not a GP voter.
As
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 07:32 PM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Eric's statement was hyperbole, designed to provoke. My own view is
that the Libertarian Party is being unfortunately wishy-washy when it
comes to the war on Iraq.
It correctly said that troops should not be blamed for
Harmon Seaver wrote:
What sort of dictatorship is this where the people own automatic weapons
freely? Shades of Switzerland!
Soviet Armenia?
When they fell out with the Azeris they got their scratch army together
in /days/
According to the Russian news they used hunting rifles.
I'd been
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:23:19PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 01:50 PM 03/20/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The other one we hear is You should be ashamed which brings a chorus
of
No, we're proud or Have you forgotten about Sept. 11th? We did have
some
older fellow stopped at
At 7:28 PM -0800 3/20/03, Tim May wrote:
Shrubya doesn't care, as he just raises taxes. (Or he squawks and
whines as Congress raises taxes, same difference.)
Tim - I don't think the cowboy (aka Shrubya) knows enough economics to
realize that, in the long term, income and expenditure must be in
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:40:52PM +, Ken Brown wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
What sort of dictatorship is this where the people own automatic weapons
freely? Shades of Switzerland!
Soviet Armenia?
When they fell out with the Azeris they got their scratch army together
in /days/
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Bill Frantz wrote:
One view of the war in Iraq is that it is to assure an oil supply so we can
take on Saudi Arabia, home of three quarters of the 911 hijackers.
Makes sense, use Saudia Arabia as a land base to take over Iraq, then
use Iraq as a land base to take over
Greetings traitors,
:-).
At 7:28 PM -0800 on 3/20/03, Tim May wrote:
In
fact, Turkey is shaking down the U.S. for $30 billion in grants and aid
and loan guarantees.
Nope. See Below.
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:32:42 -0500
To: Philodox
At 09:57 AM 03/20/2003 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Good work, Shaddack. Gold star and smiley face.
My father has mentioned the Texas City incident a few times while growing
up (he grew up in Galveston). He remembers that it basically dissappeared
in a giant fireball, and there was never an
Mildly amusing because of the name, if nothing else:
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030318-071102-9001r
-Declan
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Tim Meehan wrote:
Bill Stewart said:
Then there's the old America: Love it or Leave it line,
from folks who got really really upset when people _did_ leave it
to avoid Selective Slavery during the Vietnam Police Action.
Some yahoo from Kansas has been flaming me with
At 7:52 PM -0800 3/20/03, Tim May wrote:But the imperial power goes after
the skinny kid it knows it can beat
up, not the greater threats in the region (and in the world). Grenada,
Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iraq again. But not North Korea, not
China, not Saudi Arabia, not Russia, not
At 03:49 AM 3/20/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
...
While over 70% of local citizens are against it (caveat: I am not closely
familiar with the polling method, but no one of my local friends is
supporting Shrubya's pet war).
Your sample is probably seriously biased, though. My friends and
Tim - I don't think the cowboy (aka Shrubya) knows enough economics to
realize that, in the long term, income and expenditure must
be in some kind
of rough balance. He's always been able to lean on daddy's money.
I'm wondering whether the successive US administrations are not
increasingly
http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=644
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
\|/ :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
--*--:Instead of
At 09:24 AM 3/21/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
May thousands of AmeriKKKan troops die painfully, along with their
handlers on the East Coast, as a deterrent to future illegal wars of
aggression.
This was the part I had to think about the most. Right now, my feeling
is
that it would be a tragedy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:31:59 -0600, you wrote:
Has anyone heard any more about the announcement made by the NJ gov that if
we go to the next level -- red -- that everyone is confined to their houses?
Nope, but it's not surprising since there was NO announcement by
the NJ gov that red
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 05:41:08PM -0600, Anonymous wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:42:16PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
What bullshit. You just suck right up to those war criminals don't you?
Do you work for them too?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:18:09AM -0600, Keith Ray
At 02:04 PM 03/20/2003 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
This seems reasonable. As a large structure topples,
the sheer stress across the long axis of the building
will inexorably increase as the upper floors retard
the downward progression of the lower floors (caused
of course by gravity). I suspect
At 01:50 PM 03/20/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The other one we hear is You should be ashamed which brings a chorus of
No, we're proud or Have you forgotten about Sept. 11th? We did have some
older fellow stopped at the redlight ranting about us needing to go back to
Russia, which was
Mike Rosing said:
Given how Vancouver is going now, that might have been a nice restful place :-)
Vancouver is nice, but the economy sucks (except if you're growing). Toronto has
an okay economy but too many yuppies and climbers (and crappy pot). Montreal is
the best, but you're better off if
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:42:16PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
What bullshit. You just suck right up to those war criminals don't you?
Do you work for them too?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:18:09AM -0600, Keith Ray wrote:
argument elided
Nicely argued, Mr. Seaver. I've never seen
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
It would be a pain for their families and worse for their insurers,
certainly, but think of
the evolutionary benefits to mankind. You remove folks who
*voluntarily* gave
up moral control of their bodies to an unjust, cruel regime. Such
At 04:00 PM 03/21/2003 +, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
Surely you don't think some press announcement by a governor is
sufficient to place millions of people under house arrest
without due process, indictment, arraignment, etc.
My memories of the 1968 riots are pretty fuzzy;
Wilmington
At 03:10 AM 03/21/2003 -0800, alan wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Come on now! The Iraqis should have proven that they DON'T have any
nukular
weapons. They were unable to prove that they don't have any WMDs, so now
it's their fault they're getting invaded.
How do you prove
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is not
handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they simply give the
locations to the U.N. weapons
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
While I wish Mike were correct that the party would get some spine
just because we tell them to, I'm not holding my breath.
I was expecting better from Geoff.
The LP's traditional heritage was pretty radical about issues
like the draft (we opposed
While I wish Mike were correct that the party would get some spine
just because we tell them to, I'm not holding my breath.
I was expecting better from Geoff.
The LP's traditional heritage was pretty radical about issues
like the draft (we opposed it) and drugs (got any good pot?)
and about free
--
The Taliban did not exist back then. The guys the US aided
were for the most part, the guys that are running
Afghanistan now. The major recipients of US aid, for
example the lion of Afghanistan were the people the
Taliban murdered.
On 20 Mar 2003 at 8:16, Mike Rosing wrote:
Declan writes:
Eric's statement was hyperbole, designed to provoke. My own view is
that the Libertarian Party is being unfortunately wishy-washy when it
comes to the war on Iraq.
We've had this discussion many times before on this list.
People who know nothing about Libertarians see a word
--
On 19 Mar 2003 at 22:55, Sarad AV wrote:
how long does US analysts expect iraq to be completely
occupied by US and allied troops?
No definite plans, but Rumsfeld is thinking of an occupation
force of 75 000 for several years. Some want the kind of
occupation where any time any Iraqi
At 07:42 AM 3/20/03 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
...
The story you are telling is part of a big commie lie -- that
the US aided the bigoted Taliban against the elightened
communists who created a constitutional democracy where every
man and every women have a vote, and universal education and
I agree, and I'm including the LP on cc (which I didn't notice till
I hit reply). Now that congress has voted to support the troops
it's time for a revolution in the ballot box. If enough of us tell
the LP to get some spine, they will!
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
On Thu, 20 Mar
John Kelsey wrote:
At 07:42 AM 3/20/03 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
...
The story you are telling is part of a big commie lie -- that
the US aided the bigoted Taliban against the elightened
communists who created a constitutional democracy where every
man and every women have a vote, and
I've been thinking about this post, and though I agreed with the general
gist of it, there were some points I thought worth mentioning...
May thousands of AmeriKKKan troops die painfully, along with their
handlers on the East Coast, as a deterrent to future illegal wars of
aggression.
This
And of course, we captured a set of skyscraper collapses towards the end of
our documentary Fight Club. What suprised us was that the documentary
continued to show on cable even several months after September 11th.
-TD
_
Tired of
From: Thomas Shaddack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: terror alert black
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:26:15 +0100 (CET)
I've heard that for terror alert black we're all supposed to down a few
100
milligrams of
Variola wrote...
It would be a pain for their families and worse for their insurers,
certainly, but think of the evolutionary benefits to mankind. You remove
folks who *voluntarily* gave up moral control of their bodies to an unjust,
cruel regime. Such eagerness to be externally programmed
41 matches
Mail list logo
