Jan Dobrucki wrote:
World, this is the USA, USA, this is The World. Now that you know
each other, start thinking in a more broad perspective, please.
Blow me.
/s/
An Ugly American
--
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere Have GNU, Will Travel
The reasonable man adapts himself to the
On 28 Apr 2002 at 16:20, Morlock Elloi wrote:
How exactly does the introduction of IPV6 on a machine that is
NAT-ted by the ISP who doesn't give shit about IPV6 help the
situation ?
James A. Donald:
To connect to the IPV6 world from inside a NAT network, you need a
machine that is both
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Steve Furlong wrote:
Blow me.
Troll, and ye shalt be heard.
Seriously, while the relationship between furriners and merkins has been
notoriously strained, might there not be need for a cpunx-europe@? For
regional announcements, and such. English to be preferrable mode
Jan Dobrucki wrote:
I do have an idea thou. I'm thinking how to implement PGP into car
locks. And so far I got this: The driver has his PGP, and the door
has it's own.
Path of least resistance - *access* to the car is generally not the problem.
Instead weaker attacks such as breaking the
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if your P2P application is IPv6 compatible, you can get a semi
permanent IPv6 IP automatically from a server, and thereafter do peer to
peer, just as if you were full, no kidding, on the internet.
This nicely solves the problem with NATs, true.
Title: Re: Re: disk encryption modes
Here is a technique for encrypting a hard disk that should provide reasonable performance, good security, and be easy to render the entire disk unreadable in an emergency.
1. Start with a good (P)RNG. Seed it constantly with radioacitve decay noise,
Title: RE: disk encryption modes
With a 4096 byte cluster size, 1 GB of drive space would require 4 MB temporary key file storage. At this ratio, a 128 MB compact flash card could hold a key file for 32 GB of hard drive space. The key file could be stored on the same physical drive if you
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Steve Furlong wrote:
Blow me.
Troll, and ye shalt be heard.
Seriously, while the relationship between furriners and merkins has been
notoriously strained, might there not be need for a cpunx-europe@? For
regional announcements, and such.
I don't think you get freelance IRA guys. Not with both
kneecaps, anyway.
might be surprised - donations from the states have apparently tailled off
(having been the subject of a terrorist attack themselves they seem less
willing to fund them) and they could do with the revenue - but you are
Tim May wrote:
Not sure about the rest of europe - but we have a targetted crypto list
in the UK (UKCrypto, sensibly enough) so already have a forum for
uk-specific issues.
Thats not to say some of it wouldn't be better here - but I am sure our
problems with ..
[name elide to
--
On 29 Apr 2002 at 14:58, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
[IPv6] nicely solves the problem with NATs, true. However, most
firewalls I know are there for security reasons. Those will
likely be adapted to work for 6to4 as well. The transition
period will likely see some cracks where p2p can work,
On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 09:29 AM, dmolnar wrote:
[concerning category theory and crypto protocols]
So when you have done some real work on the matter, at least written
some
paper on the stuff, and published it, you may well write about it here.
I think that sets the bar a bit too
It appears as if Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|I chose not to reply to KPJ for two reasons:
But you _did_ in fact reply, through the cypherpunks list.
So I presume you meant to perform a social gesture of some kind, which,
to me, suggests you felt an emotional reaction to my post. These
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:58:46AM +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Adam Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [RFC3211 mode]
are you sure it's not vulnerable to splicing attacks (swapping
ciphertext blocks around to get a partial plaintext change which
recovers after a block or two)? CBC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have been thinking about the window problem and the ignition too.
What I was thinking was a car of the not so far future. Where there
wont be any windows because the driver will see the outside throu a
camera and he wont need regular lights cause there'll be
..from an ad in circulation on BBC2 (UK) if I recall inaccurately.
If they shaved your head, would you lose your individuality?
If they took away your name, would they take your identity?
[..]
16(?) men. Half with power, half with none. See how events unfold in:
The Experiment.
Coming soon
70 more e-pedophiles busted in War To Protect A Single Child.
Big bust of those who trade in verboten pixels on Tuesday. Computers
towed away to be impounded and none or more children relocated to
safer accomodation. Link between pornography and action becomes
clearer, movie at 11.
The only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Greetings.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Apr 2002 at 22:26, Jan Dobrucki wrote:
and third, Americans say, respect human rights, when the US
hasn't signed any conventions protecting human rights, because
if it did, it would have to stop sending people
18 matches
Mail list logo
