On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jason Holt wrote:
copyright issues? Why haven't I seen other papers published on usenet and
such before going to press?
This is a joke right?
Copyright, they want it as the exclusive distributor which they can't do
if it's been published somewhere else.
--
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 08:55 PM, Greg Newby wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:53:05PM -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
My experience with scientific journals is more than a few years old. Do
any of youse have personal experience with publishing both several
years ago and recently?
Not
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:53:05PM -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2002 22:20, Jim Choate wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jason Holt wrote:
copyright issues? Why haven't I seen other papers published on
usenet and such before going to press?
This is a joke right?
hi,
Book says, a construction that involved computing
LSFR's over a field of 'odd charecteristics'
is insecure.
Does that mean a register with odd number of bits is
insecure which would mean a tap sequence which
uses an odd degree polynomial is insecure?
Regards Data.
Jason Holt wrote:
Are the journals going to be snippy about
copyright issues?
Most journals don't like papers to have been published elsewhere first.
Screw 'em, I say.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
There is no limit to what a man can
The list has been under 'attack' for a while. There are multiple parties
and they don't seem to be working in concert.
I base this on the observation, for example, that during the recent
group diatribe over 'filter this ...' at one point I received a mass of
removal notices from a bunch of spam