John Kelsey wrote:
From: cyphrpunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital wallets will require real security in user PCs. Still I don't
see why we don't already have this problem with online banking and
similar financial services. Couldn't a virus today steal people's
passwords and command their banks to
cyphrpunk wrote:
If this is the model, my concern is that in practice it will often be
the case that there will be few intermediate exchanges. Particularly
in the early stages of the system, there won't be that much to buy.
Someone may accept epoints for payment but the first thing he will do
is
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-02-06-evil-twin-usat_x.htm
The facility uses software and sensors to monitor 480 wireless devices used
by medical personnel at 110 access points. Last month, it stopped about 120
attempts to steal financial information from medical
Ed Reed wrote:
I'm just curious on this point. I haven't seen much
to indicate that Microsoft and others are ready
for a nymous, tradeable software assets world.
No, and neither are corporate customers, to a large extent.
Right, so my point (I think) was that without some
indication that
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Seeing as it comes out of the TCG, this is almost certainly
the enabling hardware for Palladium/NGSCB. Its a part of
your computer which you may not have full control over.
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full control over your
Joerg Schneider wrote:
So, PassCode and similar forms of authentication help against the
current crop of phishing attacks, but that is likely to change if
PassCode gets used more widely and/or protects something of interest
to phishers.
Actually I have been waiting for phishing with MITM to
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://help.channels.aol.com/article.adp?catId=6sCId=415sSCId=4090articleId=217623
Have questions? Search AOL Help articles and tutorials:
.
If you no longer want to use AOL PassCode, you must release your screen
name from your AOL PassCode so that you will no longer need
