ATTN: John Walker - RE: [speak-freely] Speak Freely for Windows and Speak Freely mailing lists (fwd)

2003-01-27 Thread Eugen Leitl
How would you do it? Would you lift public key exchange from OpenSSL or GPG? Or just package a snapshot of GPG with Speak Freely, and adapt the call syntax? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 01:25:26 -0500 From: Benjamin T. Moore, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: ATTN: John Walker - RE: [speak-freely] Speak Freely for Windows and Speak Freely mailing lists (fwd)

2003-01-27 Thread Eugen Leitl
Apart from bugfixes (like a tunable parameter to get rid of UDP buildup in system buffer due to sample rate skew) there has been some intersting discussion on tunnelling through NAT. I just noticed that speak-freely@ doesn't have a web archive. I'll be happy to forward relevant posts to anyone

Re: ATTN: John Walker - RE: [speak-freely] Speak Freely for Windows and Speak Freely mailing lists (fwd)

2003-01-27 Thread Steve Schear
At 12:38 PM 1/27/2003 +0100, you wrote: How would you do it? Would you lift public key exchange from OpenSSL or GPG? Or just package a snapshot of GPG with Speak Freely, and adapt the call syntax? I'd love to use SpeakFreely but one of its quirks is that it uses two different ports to initiate