fogstorm wrote:
So if an Australian puts it on his web site can the German government sue for
copyright infringement? Can they prosecute for violation of their anti Nazi
laws? If a German citizen views it in Amsterdam can his government prosecute
when he returns home?
they'll most likely try
At 08:02 PM 12/3/00 -0800, Lizard wrote:
At 07:49 PM 12/3/2000, Danny Yee wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Really? Doesn't the Berne convention override national laws?
Probably, yes. Does that mean national copyright laws only apply to
their own citizens/residents? What happens in the case of dual
Lizard wrote:
Really? Doesn't the Berne convention override national laws?
Probably, yes. Does that mean national copyright laws only apply to
their own citizens/residents? What happens in the case of dual
citizenship? And does place of publication come into it?
Danny.
At 07:49 PM 12/3/2000, Danny Yee wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Really? Doesn't the Berne convention override national laws?
Probably, yes. Does that mean national copyright laws only apply to
their own citizens/residents? What happens in the case of dual
citizenship? And does place of publication
Duncan Frissell wrote:
Germany's Kampf Furor Renews by Steve Kettmann
actually, contrary to almost all other cases of censorship (not that I
say this isn't) the german state of bavaria owns the COPYRIGHT of "mein
kampf", and as such actually has some kind of standing in most of the
cases. yeah,
At 4:43 PM +0100 12/2/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
Duncan Frissell wrote:
Germany's Kampf Furor Renews by Steve Kettmann
actually, contrary to almost all other cases of censorship (not that I
say this isn't) the german state of bavaria owns the COPYRIGHT of "mein
kampf", and as such actually has some
Actually, the *US* copyright was siezed by the US government at the
beginning of the war and not returned to Germany until the last decade or
so. So there are plenty of US copies that would remain legal.
In Australia at least, I think Mein Kampf is now out of copyright (it's
still 50
