WASHINGTON (CNN) -- FBI Director Louis Freeh announced Tuesday that he will
resign his post in June.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/05/01/freeh.resigns.02/index.html
Free, encrypted, secure Web-based email at www.hushmail.com
At 06:32 PM 4/28/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
People don't need to spend several months wading through cryptography
textbooks to come up to a level that is sufficient to understand the
real issues.)
--Tim May
In fact, crypto textbooks will teach you about the tensile strength
of steel, but not
Honig:
Is it in fact a crime of fraud to advertise that you don't keep logs
when in fact you do?
Seems deceptive...
I look for the continued development of tortious evidentiary spoliation in a
digital context, which includes negative legal presumptions, sanctions up to
default
On Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at 06:05 PM, Aimee Farr wrote:
Honig:
Is it in fact a crime of fraud to advertise that you don't keep logs
when in fact you do?
Seems deceptive...
A profound new insight.
We still await some real insights from a real graduate student (!),
beyond her saying that
The idealism that I refer to is the
concept that human beings can create
something substantially better than
what exists.
This is the fundamental driving force of all human endeavor incl. tech.,
ag., etc.
Make your kids' situation better than yours.
Everything follows.
At 12:13 AM 4/30/01 -0400, Phillip H. Zakas wrote:
i agree...unless you're specifically directed to do so, maintaining log
files is completely optional.
Is it in fact a crime of fraud to advertise that you don't keep logs
when in fact you do?
At Tue, 1 May 2001 18:14:38 -0700, Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom
he communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is
a slam dunk violation of the First Amendment. It is no more acceptable
than an order
On Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at 07:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 1 May 2001 18:14:38 -0700, Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom
he communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is
a slam dunk
On Tue, 1 May 2001, David Honig wrote:
Is it in fact a crime of fraud to advertise that you don't keep logs
when in fact you do?
If someone winds up losing money (or suffering other damages)
because of it, it is at least a tort. If you were planning
some kind of money-making scam that hinged
Has anyone given any though to how log files could be accepted as
evidence in the first place? They're just text files, and exceedingly
trivial to alter, forge, erase, whatever. They get edited all the time
by hackers -- how can anyone, even the sysadmin, swear that they are
true? We just
One thing to also remember is that standard log files are nothing more than
text files and can be faked fairly easily... Which would make it wide open
for a defending attorney to argue against..
Jon
- Original Message -
From: Ray Dillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
11 matches
Mail list logo
