Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 17:59, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com wrote:
Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Hi Дилян,
here's some feedback about your build system question.
Note: I'm not one of the cyrus core developers.
if I rewrite the build
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:58:53PM +0200, ?? wrote:
if I rewrite the build system of Cyrus imap 2.4(.10) to use Automake
to generate the Makefile.in-files, will the patch be accepted in
reasonable time in git/master?
Sadly this thread seems to have degenerated again -
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 17:59, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com wrote:
Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Hi Дилян,
here's some feedback about your build system question.
Note: I'm not one of the cyrus core developers.
if I rewrite the build system of Cyrus imap 2.4(.10) to use
Hi Дилян,
here's some feedback about your build system question.
Note: I'm not one of the cyrus core developers.
if I rewrite the build system of Cyrus imap 2.4(.10) to use Automake to
generate the Makefile.in-files, will the patch be accepted in reasonable
time in git/master?
Have you
Hello Thomas,
Thanks for your feedback.
My idea is to improve the current build system by generating the
Makefile(s).in by automake.
I have some experience with Autotools. I have absolutely nothing
against CMake or other build systems, except I have no coding experience
with them.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30/07/2011, at 5:48, Дилян Палаузов
dilyan.palau...@aegee.org wrote:
I have some experience with Autotools. I have absolutely nothing
against CMake or other build systems, except I have no coding
experience with them.
Me too :(
In my experience autotools
