Hi,
In dlopen.c, we have dlopen() as wrapper on
shl_load(),
dlclose() on shl_unload() etc. Any reason for that?
Today,in HP-UX,we can directly use dlopen() and all.
The reason I am asking is, one of my clients is
complaining
that symbol relocation is happening because of this.
dl* functions
Ok. But what is the reason for still keeping shl_load
and unloads? Is it to support some old HP-UX platforms
when they didnt have dl* functions? Otherwise,we could
simply do away with these sh* functions,is not it?
--Biswatosh
--- Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Biswatosh wrote:
Hi,
After much additional testing I think I have solved the SASL related problems.
The first issue I discovered was that the reason I wasn't seeing anything
interesting in my slapd logs was because slapd wasn't being contacted. I was
using unix sockets and it turns out that I had missed a step
Biswatosh wrote:
Ok. But what is the reason for still keeping shl_load
and unloads? Is it to support some old HP-UX platforms
when they didnt have dl* functions? Otherwise,we could
simply do away with these sh* functions,is not it?
--Biswatosh
Right, HPUX systems older than 11.00 only have
