I'm tactically ignoring the bits of this I don't know the answer to:
> there are issues marked as "blockers", are all of them truly critical
I think the main criteria for being a "blocker" was to try to keep
significant breaks in compatibility to the Cython 3 release (so that
users might been
Le Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 09:44:51PM -0500, Prakhar Goel a écrit :
> > Indeed, internally it rewrites the AST, of course. I think that's the
> > simplest way to implement it. But it doesn't mean the user that write
> > the compile-time code would have to be aware of the AST at all.
> > I mean, if
I think we're past the point where more talking would help. Either I'm
missing something important or you are. Like I said, if you ever get
around to implementing this, drop me a line. I'd love to take a look.
--
Warm Regards
Prakhar Goel