Forgot reply-all... didin't we have this discussion before about
making that the default for this list as it is by-far the most common
desired behavior?
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, W. Trevor King wk
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:35 AM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:53:13PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
* Extending class cdef/cdpef/public/readonly handling to cover enums,
stucts
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
So should I go ahead and update the expected error messages in my branch?
Yes.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:42 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
W. Trevor King, 22.02.2011 18:55:
I've been working on a more explicit parser that removes the
ambiguity behind the various visibilities. This will help me ensure
proper impolementation of my cdef-ed enums/structs/...,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:48 AM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:11:03PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:02 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
An easy, if uglier, workaround would be to prepend attributes with the
class name
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:08 AM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
I'm splitting Symtab visibilities into explicit C and Python
visibilities, but am having trouble reproducing the expected error
messages for cdef_members_T517:
$ python runtests.py cdef_members_T517
Python 2.6.6
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@drexel.edu wrote:
Previous discussions in this thread [1,2] have discussed the issues
associated with overloading the 'public' keyword. For an example of
the difficulties this causes, see the ugly workaround [3] in my recent
commit [4].
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/3 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/3/3 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
This doesn't work:
def assign():
a, *b = 1,2,3,4,5
return a, b
import x
x.assign()
Traceback (most recent
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Ryan Schmidt, 06.03.2011 23:12:
There are two different files called Cython-0.14.1.tar.gz -- one in
http://www.cython.org/release/ and a different one in
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/C/Cython/:
Intersting.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 11.03.2011 19:33:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 11.03.2011 15:08:
Vitja Makarov, 11.03.2011 15:04:
2011/3/11 Stefan Behnel:
Personally
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/16/11 11:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
I'm actually leaning towards not guaranteeing the order of execution if C
doesn't do
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 03/21/2011 11:45 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
Now error/warning messages are stored in global variables at
Cython.Compiler.Errors
I think it's much better to move error handling into some object,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
there seems to be quite some interest in a project to get parts of CPython
and specifically its stdlib rewritten in Cython. I've copied the latest
python-dev mail below. The relevant part of the thread is here:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 24.03.2011 20:18:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 22.03.2011 08:59:
Robert Bradshaw, 22.03.2011 08:14:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2011 02:21, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/22 Rafe Kettler rafe.kett...@gmail.com:
I've just tried out cython-mode.el and I was a bit disappointed when it
didn't work right off the bat.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 04.04.2011 13:53:
On 04/04/2011 01:23 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 04.04.2011 12:17:
CEP up at http://wiki.cython.org/enhancements/prange
Variable handling
Rather than
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 04.04.2011 21:26:
For clarity, I'll add an example:
def f(np.ndarray[double] x, double alpha):
cdef double s = 0
cdef double tmp = 2
cdef double other = 6.6
with nogil:
for i
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:26:34 +0200, mark florisson wrote:
[clip]
For clarity, I'll add an example:
[clip]
How about making all the special declarations explicit? The automatic
inference of variables has a problem in that a small
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/05/2011 04:58 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 04/05/2011 04:53 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
mark florisson, 04.04.2011 21
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Zak Stone zst...@gmail.com wrote:
Researchers: Please consider citing this paper if Cython helps your
research in non-trivial ways.
Is this the canonical citation reference for Cython now? If so, can this be
mentioned on the Cython webpage somewhere that is
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro
arthurdesribe...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
Looking better. I would add some details about how you plan to
compare/profile your new implementations, and also at least add a note
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:56 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2011 12:53, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2011 12:45, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 11.04.2011 12:26:
Can we select tests in the tests
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 4/9/11 12:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Yep, we did that during the workshop. I thought I had sent out an
announcement, but I guess not.
Is there a summary anywhere of the exciting things that happened
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Arthur de Souza Ribeiro, 12.04.2011 14:59:
Hi Stefan, yes, I'm working on this, in fact I'm trying to recompile json
module (http://docs.python.org/library/json.html) adding some type
definitions and cython things o
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:07 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
Another, different but related issue: how can we get useful output
from the test runner? e.g. I'm running my test with a
'@cython.test_assert_path_exists(...)' and I get this error output:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 16.04.2011 08:53:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 11.04.2011 15:08:
I'm currently discussing with Maciej Fijalkowski (PyPy) how to get
Cython
running
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 15.04.2011 22:20:
Stefan Behnel, 11.04.2011 15:08:
I'm currently discussing with Maciej Fijalkowski (PyPy) how to get Cython
running on speed.pypy.org (that's what I wrote cythonrun for). If it
works
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:25 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2011 20:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 04/21/2011 10:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:51 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark florisson wrote:
So I fixed all that, but I'm
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:04 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 April 2011 06:32, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark
the real_t complex syntax? Shooting
from the sidelines, one more generic solution might be, e.g.,
I'm sorry, I'm not sure what syntax you are referring to. Are you
talking about actual complex numbers?
This:
On 28 April 2011 23:30, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
OK, I
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 04/30/2011 08:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:53 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 April 2011 12:28, Pauli Virtanenp...@iki.fi wrote:
No, just
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 29.04.2011 06:32:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
mark florisson, 28.04.2011 23:29:
On 28 April 2011 22:31, mark florisson wrote:
On 28 April 2011 22:12
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2011 18:24, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:38 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
A remaining issue which I'm not quite certain about
Dear Cython developers,
Recently I encountered a problem with Cython's automatic char* to string
conversion (Cython version 0.14.1). I'll attach two sample source files. The
first one, char2str_a.pyx prints The quick..., just as I expected. But the
second example prints ... lazy dog.. In the
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:59 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2011 00:21, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2011 18:24, Robert Bradshaw rober
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:06 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2011 18:00, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
floating is implicitly available, we could require making it explicit.
How would we make it explicit.
Require the parameterization, i.e
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/03/2011 08:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Btw we shouldn't count on pruning for the design of this, I think this
will
for a large part be used with def functions. And if you use a cdef
function
from
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
why is the nonecheck directive set to False by default? Shouldn't it
rather be a I know what I'm doing option that allows advanced users to
trade speed for safety?
The reason I'm asking is that I just enabled its
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 20.05.2011 17:33:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
why is the nonecheck directive set to False by default? Shouldn't it
rather be a I know what I'm doing option that allows
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 23.05.2011 11:29:
Stefan Behnel, 23.05.2011 11:15:
Vitja Makarov, 23.05.2011 10:50:
2011/5/23 Stefan Behnel:
I'm fine with deallocating variables that are no longer used after the
user
explicitly
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:37 PM, jpe
reply+i-954759-90be1c778e144f2c17b3665667d3d62b01062...@reply.github.com
wrote:
This optimizes startswith / endwith optimization for str.
Cool.
What's unclear to me is how str will be mapped to either bytes or unicode; I
assume at some point cython will
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 26.05.2011 10:24:
On 05/26/2011 10:12 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 26.05.2011 09:40:
the pattern of swapping out builtin methods (and perhaps
functions) with more optimized C
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/27 Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no:
On 05/27/2011 02:41 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
2011/5/27 Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de:
Hi,
could we please make it a requirement to run the complete
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
I've recently fixed some issues:
- closure variables were not tracked
- scoped expression variables were initialized to None
So, I should fix broken tests, here are some of them:
nogil (should be fixed)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
found
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 28.05.2011 00:39:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
I recently stumbled over a tradeoff question with AttributeError, and now
found the same situation for UnboundLocalError
In looking at merging fused types, it's time to nail down the syntax.
The current implementation is
ctypedef cython.fused_type(list, dict, object) fused_t
This requires an addition to the grammer to allow the call syntax in
a type declaration, as well as special casing to make it allowed
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2011 23:59, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:45 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2011 23:34, Robert Bradshaw rober
I agree.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:47 AM, sshan...@stwing.upenn.edu wrote:
Yeah, I think just erroring would be perfectly reasonable.
-Seth
Quoting Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz:
Seth Shannin wrote:
I would still make the case that currently
something is a bit off in that the
public fairly hard to find. It could be nice to make this
clearer.
-Seth
On 06/09/2011 01:57 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I agree.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:47 AM, sshan...@stwing.upenn.edu wrote:
Yeah, I think just erroring would be perfectly reasonable.
-Seth
Quoting Greg Ewing greg.ew
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2011 16:20, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hello Cython folks,
This message (see below) is the second report I've gotten of a very
strange build problem with a cython module. I'm just using the
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
Romain wants to start writing tests for his Python/ctypes backend branch, so
we need to extend the test runner.
We'll eventually want to merge his branch back into normal mainline, so I
suggest actually just
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Vitja Makarov, 04.07.2011 20:43:
It seems that hudson server is down.
It's back now. Looks like the sage.math machine was restarted.
Yep, sage.math was restarted. Thanks for getting this back up and running.
- Robert
Very cool. We should get ccache on sage.math to start using it on hudson.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to speedup runtests with ccache
How to run:
CYTHON_RUNTESTS_CCACHE=ccache python runtests.py
Running
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de
Vitja Makarov, 07.07.2011 08:32:
2011/7/7 Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 06.07.2011 21:32:
We should get ccache on sage.math to start using it on hudson.
It's
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Vitja Makarov, 07.07.2011 11:00:
2011/7/7 Stefan Behnel:
Stefan Behnel, 07.07.2011 09:29:
The .ccache directory is also there now, size is ~750M. I'll move it to
the
local scratch disc, CCACHE_DIR should do that. Does
Trevor King and I discussed this quite a while back, but every time I
got around to looking at his code (I don't think he ever created a
formal pull request) something came up. The idea was that we could
support cpdef structs and extern functions as well.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Vitja
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Chris Colbert wrote:
cdef public enum:
EV_READ = 1
EV_WRITE = 2
However, I do not like it, because I would like to use public for
other meaning (API generation).
My suggestion is
cdef
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Jason McCampbell
jmccampb...@enthought.com wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Definitely not buried for good, though we haven't made a lot of changes
recently. :) We used it for porting SciPy to .NET and re-wrote a large
number of the SciPy C module implementations in Cython.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/18 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
Trevor King and I discussed this quite a while back, but every time I
got around to looking at his code (I don't think he ever created a
formal pull request
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl wrote:
Dear developers,
I just got an error message from Cython (current Git). The error can
be reproduced by putting
cdef foo(): pass
in a file called foo.pyx, and compiling that. (I know there's an error
in the file as
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 02:24, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/18 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
Trevor King and I discussed this quite a while back, but every time I
got around to looking
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
for me to push one out. Hudson
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking in pretty good
shape, and though I know we've got a big pile of stuff currently in
progress, we've also got a big backlog of stuff to get out.
2011 15:32, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 20:04, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 13:51, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 18:06, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 July 2011 20:48, Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 23:24, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2011 21:44, Lisandro Dalcin dalc...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 11:40:
On 20 July 2011 11:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
mark florisson, 20.07.2011 10:51:
On 20 July 2011 02:32, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/16 Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl:
2011/7/15 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
I've found strange bug. In my example cimport misses fcntl.h include:
((c2f2e12...))
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:24 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
I added a test for nested parallelism with exceptions (with OpenMP
nesting explicitly enabled), however if libgomp cannot create more
threads it exits the process with exit status 1 and the message
libgomp: Thread
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
On 7 July 2011 22:39, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
On 7 July 2011 22:15, Vitja Makarov
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl wrote:
2011/7/21 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote
Stefan,
Are the lxml failures at
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-lxml-trunk-py27/
expected?
- Robert
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http://cython.org/release/Cython-0.15rc0.tar.gz
- Robert
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 July 2011 22:05, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:12 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
For my work on the _memview branch (and also on fused
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:07 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 12:00, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Vitja Makarov, 25.07.2011 10:25:
2011/7/25 Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de:
Vitja Makarov, 25.07.2011 08:41:
2011/7/23 Robert
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 26.07.2011 06:29:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:07 AM, mark florisson
It's now 'MyUtility' and
'MyUtility.proto'. If there's no objection to the ini-style header
(with requirements and other metadata
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, 26.07.2011 07:00:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
I think that would seriously help with moving shared C-code into
cython library (.h and .so).
Some things like generator
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
There are 4 test failures with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
Output with Python 2.7:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 July 2011 20:06, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:33 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2011 08:03, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
My opinion is that we create a (short-lived) branch for the release, and
continue development (ignoring the release) on master.
If CyFunction solves no problems that blocks a release, I am -1 on merging
it
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/20 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
We're long overdue for a release, and this week would be a good one
for me to push one out. Hudson
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson is looking
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2011-07-29 23:23:46 Dag Sverre Seljebotn napisał(a):
Looks very much like a numpy-on-py3 bug to me.
I have reported:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1919
(NumPy-related tests in Cython
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1. If you
are not already using the latest version from the development
repository, we encourage you to try out the release candidate:
http
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2011-07-31 09:45:15 Robert Bradshaw napisał(a):
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Cython has seen an enormous amount of development since 0.14.1
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefano stefano.k.sanfili...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've been a enthusiast Python programmer for 3 years now, and I've hailed
Cython project with great interest. Now, I'm willing to contribute. I've would
say I'm an quite an expert Python programmer and
This is getting a bit OT but is worth discussing, so I'm starting a new thread.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
- One idea is coercion of C pointers to ctypes Python objects and back
again.
Some way of requesting
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de:
Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49:
The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last
time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Would it be horribly expensive to generate a better runtime error, or even
initialize the gil on demand? If the gil is not initialized, get the thread
ID of the thread calling the callback and check against
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:49 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2011 11:39, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2011 23:33, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Would it be horribly expensive to generate a better runtime
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
I've taken another stab at #593 and changed the way decorators are currently
evaluated.
http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/593
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 08/12/2011 02:45 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
[second try in moving this discussion to cython-devel]
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 12.08.2011 08:50:
On 08/12/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 08/17/2011 09:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Stefano, 11.08.2011 16:24:
now that I've nailed Cython code, I'd like to get into something more
funny.
Currently, I'm working on a set of macros to seamlessy integrate Cython
into
CMake build process (in fact, I
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:55 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2011 00:34, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I think I found a rather serious bug: if an error label is used in a
nogil function, it tries to build a traceback. So if the GIL is
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Hi,
here's an interesting history wrap-up of SWIG, by its original author.
Very interesting thread.
One thing that stroke me when I read this (or rather when I was half-way
through) was that it might be possible to
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/8/26 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/8/25 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/8/25 Vitja
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com:
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Vitja Makarov vitja.maka...@gmail.com wrote:
I've started #715 ticket investigation.
Here is minimal test case:
# cython: language_level=3
def foo(target):
return [(e for e in t) for t in target]
Crash in the ticket is related to
1 - 100 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
