2008/4/23 Miklos Vajna [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:32:07PM +0200, Johannes Waldmann [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the current best practice for setting up
a repository for remote write acces
(and not giving full shell access)
It seems ssh is required, so
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Greg Holtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is really wrong, but I changed all instances of
getSymbolicLinkStatus to getFileStatus, and things seem to
work now. I did double check the whole tree to make sure
there were no symbolic links.
It shouldn't
Hello,
perhaps it might be worth the effort to create darcs-announce mailing
list then -- just for important announcements mostly of new releases.
For people who like to follow darcs development process from the longer
distance...
Thanks for consideration!
Karel
PS: I'm also for merging
-1
I'm a lurker, but I'm no uber darcs user or developer, so I'm not really
interested in -devel ... I like Karel's idea of a -discuss or -announce
for stuff I don't want to miss (related tools, tips from Eric, etc).
David Roundy wrote:
Hello everyone,
It seems that most folks agree that
Maybe darcs-server [1] is what you are looking for. It allows you to
push throught SSH without giving full shell access.
[1]: http://www.equational.org/darcs-server/
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
kgardas:
Hello,
perhaps it might be worth the effort to create darcs-announce mailing
list then -- just for important announcements mostly of new releases.
For people who like to follow darcs development process from the longer
distance...
Thanks for consideration!
Karel
PS: I'm also
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:13:59AM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
If you don't want to kill the user base, merging makes a *lot*
more sense, David.
More sense than what? Are you suggesting that merging the two lists is
different from deleting one of the lists?
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
droundy:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:13:59AM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
If you don't want to kill the user base, merging makes a *lot*
more sense, David.
More sense than what? Are you suggesting that merging the two lists is
different from deleting one of the lists?
Yes, I think the
Also, what happens to the mailing list archive?
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 06:23:57PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
2008/4/24 David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:13:59AM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
If you don't want to kill the user base, merging makes a *lot*
more sense, David.
If you're going to delete a list, perhaps
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:46:19PM +0300, Pekka Pessi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you limit yourself of reading from repo, you could do similar
tricks with darcs 2.0:
Match User foo ; ForceCommand darcs transfer-mode --repodir /your/repo/path
ah, transfer-mode is something new, it seem to be
Yes, I think the subscriber list should be merged, rather than
deleting
the user list subscribers.
Maybe someone with more time to spend on it than David should become
list administrator.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-users mailing list
zooko:
Yes, I think the subscriber list should be merged, rather than
deleting
the user list subscribers.
Maybe someone with more time to spend on it than David should become
list administrator.
I'm happy to do any adminstration tasks (handling unsubscribed users,
et al), if we
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zooko:
Yes, I think the subscriber list should be merged, rather than
deleting
the user list subscribers.
Maybe someone with more time to spend on it than David should become
list administrator.
I'm
Folks:
A new user started to convert his company to darcs, but then had to
back out and go back to using SVN when it turned out that darcs
whatsnew took 17 seconds and his co-workers couldn't stand that.
(The equivalent call, svn diff takes around 1.7 seconds -- about
10x as fast.)
He
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:35 AM, zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new user started to convert his company to darcs, but then had to
back out and go back to using SVN when it turned out that darcs
whatsnew took 17 seconds and his co-workers couldn't stand that.
(The equivalent call, svn
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:54:32AM +0200, Alexander Staubo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It looks like there is probably quite a bit of room for optimization
in darcs-2's use of the filesystem.
Probably. Git and Mercurial do not suffer from this problem, either.
khm. :) if you don't count the
On 2008.04.25 00:54:32 +0200, Alexander Staubo [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled
1.2K characters:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:35 AM, zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new user started to convert his company to darcs, but then had to
back out and go back to using SVN when it turned out that darcs
My experience is that Darcs performs rather poorly in the presence of
large, untracked files in the working directory. It probably reads
each file into memory, perhaps in order to determine whether it's
binary or not?
I can say for sure that this is not the case. The directories were
Im using the latest 2.0 stable build of darcs for windows, without
cygwin.
When I try to get darcs gives me an error about wget and curl being
unrecognized internal or external commands.
Is there some installation step that I need to perform with either of
these programs?
I dont see anything
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Jon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using the latest 2.0 stable build of darcs for windows, without
cygwin.
Currently Zooko seems to be our windows build guru, and I believe he uses
cygwin.
When I try to get darcs gives me an error about wget and curl
I think if you have wget.exe you can just place it in your path and
this will start working.
OK, I grabbed a copy of wget and now I can pull the darcs source repo.
But when I try to grab my own repo through a website I get an error
about the inventory directory being missing.
My repo
22 matches
Mail list logo
