On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:12:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun Apr 27 21:09:50 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* SlurpDirectory.lhs: remove apparently pointless aliases
Thanks for the cleanup! These functions used to be more interesting, but
that got changed in a restructuring during the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:00:13PM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Thu Apr 24 14:02:26 CEST 2008 Nicolas Pouillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure: more precise error messages about packages.
Applied. Thanks!
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:05:39PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fri Apr 25 16:01:53 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fpstring.c: switch a memchr for memrchr
See http://bugs.darcs.net/issue814; memrchr speeds up is_funky quite a
bit and thus helps whatsnew -s. It doesn't seem to break (any
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:31:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mon Apr 28 21:00:50 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Prefs.lhs: ignore profiling intermediate files
Accepted.
Mon Apr 28 21:01:15 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Prefs.lhs: ignore .git
Accepted.
Mon Apr 28 21:02:01 EDT 2008
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Christopher Lane Hinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's based on 'make test' I've been told there are even more tests.
You could also run make test_network and just plain make (which
also builds docs and changelog).
David
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 23 Apr 2008, at 00:00, zooko wrote:
2. Starting using hashed-format repositories.
Interesting benchmarks! What about the darcs 2 repository format?
I didn't try it. Here -- now that you ask so nicely, I'll do so.
Okay, the result is
On 29 Apr 2008, at 16:36, zooko wrote:
I didn't try it. Here -- now that you ask so nicely, I'll do so.
That wasn't an order to re-run the benchmarks, just a question :) But
thanks anyway
Okay, the result is that darcs-2-format performs exactly the same
way that hashed-format does on
On 23 Apr 2008, at 00:00, zooko wrote:
2. Starting using hashed-format repositories.
Interesting benchmarks! What about the darcs 2 repository format? If
you have no need to preserve darcs 1 compatability, should you switch
to the new format? How come you didn't do that in this case?
Tue Apr 29 16:19:17 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Prefs.lhs: add cabal intermediates to ignore
Re-send, not depending on rejected patches.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
New patches:
[Prefs.lhs: add cabal intermediates to ignore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re-send, not depending on
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:21:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tue Apr 29 16:19:17 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Prefs.lhs: add cabal intermediates to ignore
Re-send, not depending on rejected patches.
Applied. Thanks!
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:57:52 +0100
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Apr 2008, at 16:36, zooko wrote:
I think the point of the darcs-2-format is new improved patch
semantics:
Ok, since I have no need to preserve darcs-1 compatability and the
new format is as fast as the
Tue Apr 29 16:32:13 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ordered.lhs: explain acronyms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
New patches:
[Ordered.lhs: explain acronyms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hunk ./src/Darcs/Patch/Ordered.lhs 98
infixr 5 ::, ::, ++, ++
+-- forward list
data FL a C(x z)
On 2008.04.28 09:27:27 -0700, David Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled 1.7K
characters:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Gwern Branwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by co_slurpy being strinct. It looks to me
like
it's got adequate unsafeInterleaveIO to make it
Mon Apr 28 23:09:44 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* FastPackedString, OldFastPackedString.hs: add in 'allPS' definition
This is a missing list utility function; for FPS.hs, it's the usual wrapping,
while I copy the Bytestring version (swapping 'unsafePeformIO' for
'inplacePerformIO') into
Ignore this please. The whitespace changes slipped in for some reason,
I'm going to try to re-record and re-send.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mon Apr 28 23:09:44 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* FastPackedString, OldFastPackedString.hs: add in 'allPS' definition
Mon Apr 28 23:09:44 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* FastPackedString, OldFastPackedString.hs: add in 'allPS' definition
This is a missing list utility function; for FPS.hs, it's the usual wrapping,
while I copy the Bytestring version (swapping 'unsafePeformIO' for
'inplacePerformIO') into
Tue Apr 29 23:19:21 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* darcs prefs: remove type witness stuff, breaks compiles
It's worth noting that the test as it stood ran on every patch record, and
allows patches to be recorded only if one can compile with type witnesses.
It's also worth noting that 6.8.x
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tue Apr 29 23:19:21 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* darcs prefs: remove type witness stuff, breaks compiles
It's worth noting that the test as it stood ran on every patch record,
and allows patches to be recorded only if one can
But when I try to grab my own repo through a website I get an error
about the inventory directory being missing.
My repo doesnt have an inventory directory, it does have an
'inventories' directory though.
What am I doing wrong here?
My repo is hosted at
http://darcs.mmmpie.com/hb
It
19 matches
Mail list logo
