Since (as recently posted), my installation of darcs.cgi is broken, and since (as per their trac) the trac-darcs plugin isn't working yet, and since someone on IRC mentioned that they like darcsweb, I decided I would give it another try.
However, this time ended the same as last time: I looked at at darcsweb installation over the web and gave up on it -- too ugly, too confusing. Here are my complaints as posted to IRC. <zooko> Well, maybe I should try installing darcsweb since darcs.cgi is broken on my system. <zooko> Grr. darcsweb bothers me because it uses different terminology. <zooko> I don't want to set up some infrastructure for my team, who I just now finished (almost) converting them to darcs, <zooko> and then say "Okay, whenever the web site says 'shortlog', that means 'patch name', and whenever it says 'tree', that means 'version'..." <zooko> I suppose I could change those names. :-) <zooko> And why does it have "unified" and "plain", both of which emit unified diffs? <zooko> Oh. "plain" means not colored. <zooko> And what the hell is "commitdiff". Grr. <zooko> Forget it. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
