Hi,
On 10 November 2014 14:49, Stéphane Aulery saul...@free.fr wrote:
Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 à 09:24:09, Herbert Xu a écrit :
Stéphane Aulery saul...@free.fr wrote:
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501566
I'm sorry but this patch looks wrong and the text looks
2014-11-11 14:23:21 +0100, Stephen Shirley:
[...]
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
It doesn't cover the case where n2 is later changed, and how n1 does
not follow this, but it's the simplest fix i see.
[...]
That's ambiguous.
Maybe:
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Stephen Shirley wrote:
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
It doesn't cover the case where n2 is later changed, and how n1 does
not follow this, but it's the simplest fix i see.
Yes that sounds much better. Please send a patch.
Hello,
Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 11:08:05, Herbert Xu a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Stephen Shirley wrote:
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
It doesn't cover the case where n2 is later changed, and how n1 does
not follow this, but it's the
Hello,
Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 11:08:05, Herbert Xu a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:23:21PM +0100, Stephen Shirley wrote:
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
It doesn't cover the case where n2 is later changed, and how n1 does
not follow this, but it's the
Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:20:46, Herbert Xu a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Even if csh is intentionally in the See also section despite not
being referenced anywhere else, is it also intentional that chsh is
not in that section despite the
Stephane Chazelas stephane.chaze...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-11 14:23:21 +0100, Stephen Shirley:
[...]
[n1]n2Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2.
It doesn't cover the case where n2 is later changed, and how n1 does
not follow this, but it's the simplest fix i see.
[...]
That's
