On 03/03/2019 17:39, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 04:43:09PM +, Harald van Dijk wrote:
The effect of the command built-in is that "if the command_name is the same
as the name of one of the special built-in utilities, the special properties
in the enumerated list at the
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 04:43:09PM +, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On 03/03/2019 13:57, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:28:44PM +, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > > That is *a* real bug here, not *the* real bug. This leaves the buggy
> > > behaviour of the "command" built-in
On 03/03/2019 13:57, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:28:44PM +, Harald van Dijk wrote:
That is *a* real bug here, not *the* real bug. This leaves the buggy
behaviour of the "command" built-in intact in the test case I included in
the message you replied to.
I don't quite
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:28:44PM +, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>
> That is *a* real bug here, not *the* real bug. This leaves the buggy
> behaviour of the "command" built-in intact in the test case I included in
> the message you replied to.
I don't quite understand. Could you explain what is
