Yehuda Katz wrote:
> > However, it feels like the BEST option would be to add a standard database
> > trigger and let the database handle it without the potential for problems.
> > Perhaps this is a case for supporting arbitrary options and letting the
> > adapters generate the appropriate SQL. So:
>
> > has n, :posts, :counter_cache => true

So... has anyone tried this yet? If not, I'll see what I can do with
it soon.



On Apr 9, 12:39 pm, myobie <myo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I love the SQL trigger idea, that would be the best. Let the db
> maintain integrity.
>
> I have yet to have any out of sync issues with after_... calls doing
> counter cache like functionality, but I suppose it could happen.
>
> Nathan
>
> On Apr 6, 7:34 am, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It might be interesting to use Merb's run_later facilities to asynchronously
> > update the counter cache on a periodic basis (or only if something was added
> > to a queue).
>
> > However, it feels like the BEST option would be to add a standard database
> > trigger and let the database handle it without the potential for problems.
> > Perhaps this is a case for supporting arbitrary options and letting the
> > adapters generate the appropriate SQL. So:
>
> > has n, :posts, :counter_cache => true
>
> > and automigrate would generate the appropriate SQL for the trigger for each
> > supported DB. What do you think?
>
> > -- Yehuda
>
> > 2009/4/5 Jacques Crocker <merbj...@gmail.com>
>
> > > There's no reason to ever change a counter_cache after_save. You need
> > > a combination of several hooks (after_create, after_delete, etc).
> > > Having it abstracted seems greatly preferred. Even with these hooks,
> > > the count would often go out of sync so I had an update_cache method
> > > that would synchronize everything, running once in a while. And all
> > > this logic duplicated for each has n relationship.
>
> > > Even with this plugin, I still run into the issue that the delete
> > > method on an association isnt implemented in Datamapper 0.9.11. So
> > > running "user.posts.delete" returns the message "NotImplementedError:
> > > destroy *with* validations has not be written yet, try destroy!". So
> > > its likely I'll still need these synchronization methods that keep the
> > > counters in sync after certain operations.
>
> > > On Apr 5, 3:58 am, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Why is a counter cache harder than a simple after_save hook. Having 
> > > > never
> > > > actually attempted to roll my own, I'm curious about what specifically 
> > > > is
> > > > difficult.
>
> > > > -- Yehuda
>
> > > > 2009/4/5 Jacques Crocker <merbj...@gmail.com>
>
> > > > > If you're in need of counter caches in Datamapper, I found a pretty
> > > > > nice plugin that is working great for me so far.
> > > > >http://github.com/saimonmoore/dm-counter-cache
>
> > > > > Maybe I'm crazy, but can't imagine anyone writing a moderate sized web
> > > > > app and not needing counter caches. Any summary list page is going to
> > > > > cause an N+1 craziness of count(*) queries. Rolling your own just a
> > > > > complete mess (thats what I did before I found this plugin).
>
> > > > > We need to get this into dm-more. The plugin is well spec'ed. Maybe we
> > > > > should tweak the interface, I'm not sure. Dan, can you take a look and
> > > > > see if its to your liking?
>
> > > > > This is a followup to the thread:
>
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper/browse_thread/thread/95d21c.
> > > ..
>
> > > > > Thanks
>
> > > > --
> > > > Yehuda Katz
> > > > Developer | Engine Yard
> > > > (ph) 718.877.1325
>
> > --
> > Yehuda Katz
> > Developer | Engine Yard
> > (ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to datamapper@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
datamapper+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to