, with
large result sets this won't work.
Any tips? Is this a known problem anyone else has run into? Any
suggestions where to start looking in the source?
Ciao,
Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
DataMapper group.
To post to this group, send email
I needed to add gem 'activerecord', RAILS_VERSION to my
Gemfile. I put it in the test group.
Rspec still works with DM, its just the AR gem needed to be loaded.
Require doesn't do it the same was as the gemfile, apparently.
Ciao,
Kevin
On Jul 9, 10:04 am, Kevin inspir
You could always hack around it with Model.find_by_sql - though that
returns a frozen struct I think?
Unfortunately I'm not expert enough to reply about other ways to hack
around it :)
-Kevin
On Jul 7, 7:59 pm, David Masover ni...@slaphack.com wrote:
I'm not talking about dm-validations
Anyone else noticed this strangeness with GROUP BY and ORDER BY being
included for all association retrievals? Any tips where to look in
the source?
-Kevin
On Jun 27, 6:14 pm, Kevin inspir...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my next thing to hack/fix, hopefully:
Groups HABTM Users. Calling
Yeah, the source is pretty readable though for most things, I've been
doing searches through it when I have questions.
The API is available here to.
http://rdoc.info/projects/datamapper/dm-core
We should add FAQs to the wiki or something.
-Kevin
On Jul 7, 7:22 am, Yuri Smirnov tycoo
Clever! This would be handy to mention in the docs/website.
-Kevin
On May 27, 1:46 pm, Jonathan Stott jonathan.st...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Enum Type
I'm not sure about this. It might be possible via subclassing though,
as suggested.
2. unsigned smallint
property :little_counter, Integer
As a follow-up, how does one make an Integer column not_null default
0? Looks like not_null for text columns is with :length = 1..999 vs.
0..
I don't want to validate it's existence on setting, I just want to
force the value to be 0 after its been created.
-Kevin
On May 27, 1:46 pm, Jonathan
I don't know how to benchmark this better, but I wonder if the
slowness is because we preload all the models. Isn't one of the
beauties of the rails console that it'll autoload files based on what
you try to instantiate?
from
, then I block out the bottom with __END__ and change what I'm
testing in it. Then I can just run it from my editor. Its a bit
slower going than being able to mess with state/etc as from a console
though.
Good morning!
-Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Another suggestion would be more info on exactly what paranoid does in
terms of the get methods and destroy methods (i.e. nothing to destroy,
but adds checks against the pranoiddeleted boolean or datetime being
null).
More info about repositories and how to change them. Perhaps an
example case
You tried the obvious: u = People.first; u.houses.all(:order =
[:bought_date.asc])? I'm not an expert (yet) but seems like it should
work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
DataMapper group.
To post to this group, send email to
Agreed, I would lve a way to globally disable this instead of
having to monkey-patch :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
DataMapper group.
To post to this group, send email to datamap...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Ah, so flag assigns a bit to each flag and can add them together/etc
to allow multiple flags to be set?
Your failing test seems to be a bug with it, eh? Add a ticket to the
lighthouse?
http://datamapper.lighthouseapp.com/projects/20609-datamapper/overview
--
You received this message because
Try querying it differently, perhaps only .all calls on the
association:
locations.all(:order = [:time.desc]).first.lat
or even (should be same thing)
locations(:order = [:time.desc]).first.lat
-Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
DataMapper
There must be some funny business in your models try stripping
them down. If you still get troubles, post a full example script as a
github gist or somewhere to try?
My test with similar models (I think?) in my app. Many topics, each
one has a user. Each topic has a board.
I still say making a datamapper-only test script is the only/best way
to test things like this (or use an rspec tests, thats what I've been
doing lately and its nice since you can use spork to have the slow
stuff preloaded).
-Kevin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
this helps
Kevin
On Feb 15, 3:38 pm, Dan Kubb (dkubb) dan.k...@gmail.com wrote:
MarkMT,
Unfortunately I'm getting
the wrong people, consistently for a number of different cases. Is
there some reason why this should not be expected to work?
Can you try with edge dm-core? There was a recent fix
I experience the same issue with MySQL 5 using dm-core 0.10.2
The generated SQL looks for the wrong ID. My workaround is to first
get the orange label then list all its posts:
label = Label.first(:name = 'orange')
posts = label.posts
This seems to work for me.
Kevin
On Feb 13, 9:22 am, casual
What's the sql that you're seeing?
At first I thought you were using HABTM and needed to query the :through
relationship, but its just has n, it should be pretty simple (i.e. work as you
expect)
Ciao,
Kevin
Desire makes everything blossom; possession makes everything wither and fade.
- Proust
19 matches
Mail list logo
