On 08/01/2014 04:34 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On 08/01/2014 04:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 08/01/2014 05:02 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node
sound-codec?
Well, there is _zero_ cases when the audio
Hello.
On 01-08-2014 9:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The board uses aic3106 for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
On 08/01/2014 03:49 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node
sound-codec?
Well, there is _zero_ cases when the audio codec node is named as
sound-codec in linux-next but we have wm, tlv, twl, max etc.
Yeah, there are
Hello.
On 08/01/2014 05:02 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node
sound-codec?
Well, there is _zero_ cases when the audio codec node is named as
sound-codec in linux-next but we have wm, tlv, twl, max etc.
Hi,
On 08/01/2014 04:13 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 08/01/2014 05:02 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I do. We should follow the standard consistently. Why not call the node
sound-codec?
Well, there is _zero_ cases when the audio codec node is named as
sound-codec in linux-next
The board uses aic3106 for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts
index 09118c72e83f..b9ef2be0b145 100644
On 07/31/2014 05:24 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 07/31/2014 02:18 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The board uses aic3106 for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-evm.dts | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)