On 02.10.2012 18:50, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at
On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:50, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012
On 04.10.2012 11:38, Porter, Matt wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:50, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:57:30AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 04.10.2012 11:38, Porter, Matt wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:50, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel
On 04.10.2012 12:28, Matt Porter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:57:30AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 04.10.2012 11:38, Porter, Matt wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:50, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02,
On 09/22/2012 06:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:20:58PM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
+config SND_DAVINCI_HAVE_SRAM
+bool
+default y if ARCH_DAVINCI=y
+default n if ARCH_OMAP=y
+
I've been sitting on this mostly since it seems like a step back from
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it can
be decided based on the compatible property for the device.
That's not really the problem here - the
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it can
be decided based on the compatible property for the device.
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it
can
be decided based on
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
It is better to have this information passed as device_data
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 09/22/2012 06:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:20:58PM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
+config SND_DAVINCI_HAVE_SRAM
+ bool
+ default y if ARCH_DAVINCI=y
+ default n if ARCH_OMAP=y
+
I've
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution.
It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:50:14PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 18:41, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 13:06, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 10/2/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On
15 matches
Mail list logo
