On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:41:42PM -0800, Jared Still wrote:
It can be. Even a soft parse requires a latch in the database SGA,
and since all latches are serialized, it could be a problem in a busy
system.
I am far from the expert in parsing and latching, but i do plan to run
some
tests
It can be. Even a soft parse requires a latch in the database SGA,
and since all latches are serialized, it could be a problem in a busy
system.
I am far from the expert in parsing and latching, but i do plan to run
some
tests comparing standard (easy) and DBMS_SQL (somewhat hard) cursors
in
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:32:18PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
Tim,
Got just one warning with the new 1.32 release on Mac OS X 10.2.2:
In file included from DBI.xs:1355:
DBI.xs: In function `dbih_set_attr_k':
DBI.xs:536: warning: passing arg 0 of `set_trace' from incompatible pointer type
On Mon 02 Dec 2002 14:25, Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:30:04PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Mon 02 Dec 2002 12:28, H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 02 Dec 2002 02:32, David Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
Got just one
$Subject =~ s/unsuscribe/unsubscribe/;
Why does that proove to be such a difficult word? :)
--
H.Merijn BrandAmsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0 632 on HP-UX 10.20 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
WinNT 4, Win2K pro WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.024
On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 01:51 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Uh, that one had been reported but I lost the plot before the release.
I'm pretty sure it's not significant. Does this fix it?
Yep, sure does.
Regards,
David
--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
[EMAIL
The attached patch fixes two bugs in my code spotted by Tim. First, the
unescaping of keys with literal '\n' and '\r' in DBI::ProfileData was
broken. Second, the broken test marked XXX fix me in t/42prof_data.t
has been repaired. It was using the count field as an identifier for the
record when
- Original Message -
From:
Ing. Hector
Alfonso Angulo Moreno
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 9:50
PM
Subject: unsuscribe
**Disclaimer
Information contained in this E-MAIL being
I doubt this will do much good since you didn't read the responses
to the last person who sent such a request to the list, but if you
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you will receive instructions
that include how to unsubscribe from this list.
The same instructions were sent to you when the list
10 matches
Mail list logo