Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
--
Greg Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copeland Computer Consulting
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Ian Barwick [EMAIL
This looks long, but the question at the end is really quite simple.
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:56 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
(And should there be a section for $drh objects, BTW?).
Using a $drh directly is discouraged (partly because it's likely
to break if you use the proxy).
Ah,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
This looks long, but the question at the end is really quite simple.
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:56 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
(And should there be a section for $drh objects, BTW?).
Using a $drh directly is
