Re: DBD::Pg tables() (was Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20)

2002-12-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:38:52PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: Well, since it appears that DBD::Pg's tables() method currently doesn't support the $catalog, $schema, $table, $type arguments, perhaps it should be updated to do so, and have the deprecated call to tables() with no args not

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-12-01 Thread Thomas A. Lowery
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:38:52PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found a bug in the -tables method. It includes all the system tables.

Re: DBD::Pg tables() (was Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20)

2002-12-01 Thread David Wheeler
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: Well, since it appears that DBD::Pg's tables() method currently doesn't support the $catalog, $schema, $table, $type arguments, perhaps it should be updated to do so, and have the deprecated call to tables() with no args not return

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-12-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:38:52PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-11-30 Thread Jason E. Stewart
Jason E. Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found a bug in the -tables method. It includes all the system tables. A patch is at the bottom of the message. Thanks Dave, Patch applied and committed. It will appear in the next release of DBD::Pg.

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-11-30 Thread Thomas A. Lowery
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found a bug in the -tables method. It includes all the system tables. A patch is at the bottom of the message. I modified the tables and table_info methods to include the system

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-11-30 Thread David Wheeler
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 12:47 PM, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: I modified the tables and table_info methods to include the system tables. Okay, so the question is, is this a desirable change? Do people want to know about the system tables or not? Is there a standard answer to this

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-11-30 Thread Thomas A. Lowery
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:51:14PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 12:47 PM, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: I modified the tables and table_info methods to include the system tables. Okay, so the question is, is this a desirable change? Do people want to know

DBD::Pg tables() (was Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20)

2002-11-30 Thread David Wheeler
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 01:18 PM, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: IMHO: a Pg only function is not a good option. It's very difficult to write portable code. Fair enough. The DBI doc reads: tables Warning: This method is experimental and may change. @names

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20

2002-11-30 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found a bug in the -tables method. It includes all the system tables. A patch is at the bottom of the message. I modified the tables