Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-11 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:38:46PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 10, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: What does perl -V report? @INC: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/i386-freebsd /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/i386-freebsd

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-11 Thread Jeff Zucker
Tim Bunce wrote: Meanwhile, the best workaround for the DBI probably to make t/50dbm.t remove from @INC any dirs which match /\/5\.[0-9.]$/ but which don't also have an arch-specific directory in @INC. This seems simpler (tests for ability to run a method than can only be run if the

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-11 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:45:37AM -0800, Jeff Zucker wrote: Tim Bunce wrote: Meanwhile, the best workaround for the DBI probably to make t/50dbm.t remove from @INC any dirs which match /\/5\.[0-9.]$/ but which don't also have an arch-specific directory in @INC. This seems simpler (tests

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-11 Thread David Wheeler
On Mar 11, 2004, at 1:59 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: Note that .../5.6.1 and .../5.005 don't have .../i386-freebsd as well. Right, because those aren't compiled (XS) modules. I think the bug here is that BerkeleyDB got installed into a non-arch specific directory even though it's a compiled extension.

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-10 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:22:45AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 9, 2004, at 7:16 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: A release candidate is available for testing at: http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz I get failures on FreeBSD 4.8. Are these due to warnings?

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-10 Thread David Wheeler
On Mar 10, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: Any idea why your perl v5.8.2 has .../5.6.1/... in its @INC? Could it be because site_perl should have pure Perl modules in it, and so they should always work for later versions of Perl? I don't know the answer, really; it was put into @INC when I

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-09 Thread David Wheeler
On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Zucker wrote: Thanks much for your tests, David. I'm wondering if the mismatch between your reported perl version 5.8.2 and the location of BerkeleyDB in a 5.6.1 directory has something to do with the results? Ah, yes, curious. I didn't even know that was

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-09 Thread Jeff Zucker
I get a warning on 50dbm.t - odd, I could swear it wasn't there when I uploaded :-(. Anyway, it seems that BerkeleyDB will throw a warning (not an error) when you attempt to insert an undef into a column. The warning goes away if I insert something other than NULL in the third test insert.

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Tim Bunce wrote: A release candidate is available for testing at: http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz all passed with 5.9.1-tobe on linux. Thanks Tim! __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.42 release candidate for testing

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Leffler
A release candidate is available for testing at: http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz Seemed OK on MacoS X 10.3 with Perl 5.8.3: Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 3) configuration: Platform: osname=darwin, osvers=7.2.0,