On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:38:46PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 10, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
What does perl -V report?
@INC:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/i386-freebsd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/i386-freebsd
Tim Bunce wrote:
Meanwhile, the best workaround for the DBI probably to make t/50dbm.t
remove from @INC any dirs which match /\/5\.[0-9.]$/ but which don't
also have an arch-specific directory in @INC.
This seems simpler (tests for ability to run a method than can only be
run if the
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:45:37AM -0800, Jeff Zucker wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
Meanwhile, the best workaround for the DBI probably to make t/50dbm.t
remove from @INC any dirs which match /\/5\.[0-9.]$/ but which don't
also have an arch-specific directory in @INC.
This seems simpler (tests
On Mar 11, 2004, at 1:59 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Note that .../5.6.1 and .../5.005 don't have .../i386-freebsd as well.
Right, because those aren't compiled (XS) modules.
I think the bug here is that BerkeleyDB got installed into a non-arch
specific directory even though it's a compiled extension.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:22:45AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 9, 2004, at 7:16 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
A release candidate is available for testing at:
http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz
I get failures on FreeBSD 4.8. Are these due to warnings?
On Mar 10, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Any idea why your perl v5.8.2 has .../5.6.1/... in its @INC?
Could it be because site_perl should have pure Perl modules in it, and
so they should always work for later versions of Perl? I don't know the
answer, really; it was put into @INC when I
On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Zucker wrote:
Thanks much for your tests, David. I'm wondering if the mismatch
between your reported perl version 5.8.2 and the location of
BerkeleyDB in a 5.6.1 directory has something to do with the results?
Ah, yes, curious. I didn't even know that was
I get a warning on 50dbm.t - odd, I could swear it wasn't there when I
uploaded :-(. Anyway, it seems that BerkeleyDB will throw a warning
(not an error) when you attempt to insert an undef into a column. The
warning goes away if I insert something other than NULL in the third
test insert.
Tim Bunce wrote:
A release candidate is available for testing at:
http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz
all passed with 5.9.1-tobe on linux.
Thanks Tim!
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just
A release candidate is available for testing at:
http://homepage.eircom.net/~timbunce/DBI-1.42-rc1-20040309.tar.gz
Seemed OK on MacoS X 10.3 with Perl 5.8.3:
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 3) configuration:
Platform:
osname=darwin, osvers=7.2.0,
10 matches
Mail list logo