On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:37:12PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
I had forgot that Search goes through the entire tarball looking for .pm
files. EU::MakeMaker doesn't do this. It only uses modules in ./ lib/ or
contiguous subdirectories containing a Makefile.PL. I found this out when I
tried to
This is an important topic, but dbi-dev probably isn't the right place anymore.
Thanks.
Tim.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:36:05AM +, Graham Barr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:37:12PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
I had forgot that Search goes through the entire tarball looking for .pm
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 01:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
This is an important topic, but dbi-dev probably isn't the right place
anymore.
Thanks.
Shall we move it to p5p? I think that Brian's and Grahams last posts
would need to be re-posted there.
David
--
David Wheeler
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Graham Barr wrote:
If the inclusion of modules in distributions is common and t/ is not
acceptable then a common place should be agreeded. I almost suggested
this recently with the release of CPAN::MakeMaker which depends on .
being in @INC. But it has the side affect
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:51:10AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Graham Barr wrote:
If the inclusion of modules in distributions is common and t/ is not
acceptable then a common place should be agreeded. I almost suggested
this recently with the release of
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 07:00 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:51:10AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Graham Barr wrote:
If the inclusion of modules in distributions is common and t/ is not
acceptable then a common place should be agreeded. I
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:37 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
I'd just hack in the very few alternatives you need (/ + Max + VMS,
you can ignore windows as / works fine) in a BEGIN block.
Um, what is it on VMS?
...Never mind, I can look in File::Spec::VMS.
Or not. Here's what I got:
my
On 26/11/02 07:17 -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 07:00 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:51:10AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Graham Barr wrote:
If the inclusion of modules in distributions is common and t/ is
not
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:30:43PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:39:48PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
Hey Tim,
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:53:39AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
Thomas A. Lowery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:13 PM, Graham Barr wrote:
If the inclusion of modules in distributions is common and t/ is not
acceptable then a common place should be agreeded. I almost suggested
this recently with the release of CPAN::MakeMaker which depends on .
being in @INC. But it has
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:09:40PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 01:49 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
Is t/ the only directory? It would be nice to leave t/ for tests.
Is the indexer documented someplace? I was having trouble with it
parsing the version number of
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
And to load the File::Spec module you've supplied you'll need a use
lib
:-)
Heh, good point.
I'd just hack in the very few alternatives you need (/ + Max + VMS,
you can ignore windows as / works fine) in a BEGIN block.
Um,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:39:48PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
Hey Tim,
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:53:39AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
Thomas A. Lowery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first thing I noticed is perl Makefile.PL croaked
13 matches
Mail list logo
