Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-17 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 06/16/10 19:37, Tim Bunce wrote: Done. But there's no need to wait for those results as there are some windows failures on 1.611_91 that need fixing: http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=DBI%201.611_91;reports=1;os=MSWin32 As short explained in irc, Cwd::abs_path from PathTools 3.31 seems

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/6/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t Should

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/6/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Great. I really get blushed since you named me twice in Changes - but shouldn't

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-16 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Not in

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/6/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped

DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-15 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads. Jens

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Great. Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our

Re: DBI development release ready to ship

2010-06-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t Should they be in the MANIFEST? Tim.