On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:07:46 -0700, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more likely, may leave it out
2010/9/1 H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:07:46 -0700, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's back in. I may remove it
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:56:22AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:07:46 -0700, Darren Duncan
dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:15:32PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
What's the state of play?
Will DBI 1.614 still lack the POLLUTE or did you put that back in? -- Darren
Duncan
It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more likely, may leave it out and
individual developers
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more likely, may leave it out and
individual developers deal with failure reports on perl 5.13.3+/5.14.
You may “remove it…or, more likely, leave it out”? Huh?
David
On Aug 31, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more likely, may leave it out
and
individual developers deal with failure reports on perl 5.13.3+/5.14.
You may “remove it…or, more likely, leave it out”? Huh?
Ug. I meant may restore it or, more
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:55:32AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's back in. I may remove it for 1.615 or, more likely, may leave it out and
individual developers deal with failure reports on perl 5.13.3+/5.14.
You may “remove
2010/8/30 Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com:
What's the state of play?
Beside the failing test on Win32 which needs a detailed view, not really.
I'd like to use dbd_edit_mm_attribs for reworked tests in SQL::Statement
(but I'm not near to the finish line, so maybe 1.615 could be ready then ^^)
and
Tim Bunce wrote:
What's the state of play?
Will DBI 1.614 still lack the POLLUTE or did you put that back in? -- Darren
Duncan
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:40:52 +0200, H.Merijn Brand
h.m.br...@xs4all.nl wrote:
What's the state of play?
Jens has to make t/50dbm_simple.t more defensive
Done and passed. 1.163_92 is up and available
Thank you Tim for the speedy action
--
H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger
10 matches
Mail list logo