Is there any value in returning a value (pun intended)
from STORE? E.g.:
sub STORE {
...
return 1;
For dbd_db_STORE_attrib(), DBI::DBD states:
The return value is TRUE if you have handled the
attribute or FALSE otherwise.
Does the same rule apply to STORE()? If so, where
is the
On Fri 24 Oct 2003 11:00, Steffen Goeldner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any value in returning a value (pun intended)
from STORE? E.g.:
sub STORE {
...
return 1;
For dbd_db_STORE_attrib(), DBI::DBD states:
The return value is TRUE if you have handled the
attribute
H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Fri 24 Oct 2003 11:00, Steffen Goeldner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any value in returning a value (pun intended)
from STORE? E.g.:
sub STORE {
...
return 1;
For dbd_db_STORE_attrib(), DBI::DBD states:
The return value is TRUE if
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:00:55AM +0200, Steffen Goeldner wrote:
Is there any value in returning a value (pun intended)
from STORE? E.g.:
sub STORE {
...
return 1;
For dbd_db_STORE_attrib(), DBI::DBD states:
The return value is TRUE if you have handled the
attribute
Jim Cromie wrote:
a poor subject line (was: and what about named placeholders ?),
and (perhaps) the wrong list (dbi-users).
So I request comments (consensus would be optimistic) and discussion
on whether/how to devise a feature set which would make named place-holders
free or almost free for
Jim Cromie wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
a poor subject line (was: and what about named placeholders ?),
and (perhaps) the wrong list (dbi-users).
So I request comments (consensus would be optimistic) and discussion
on whether/how to devise a feature set which would make named place-holders
free or
