Re: DBURL name scheme

2004-11-29 Thread Darren Duncan
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Hans Schou wrote: But making dbi:// a default prefix will probably restrict the use of DBURL to only DBI. It is not realistic to think that MySQL and PostgreSQL would implement such a naming scheme, where as the original idea might be accepted. Considering that it sounds

Re: DBURL name scheme

2004-11-29 Thread Hans Schou
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Darren Duncan wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Hans Schou wrote: But making dbi:// a default prefix will probably restrict the use of DBURL to only DBI. It is not realistic to think that MySQL and PostgreSQL would implement such a naming scheme, where as the original idea

Re: DBURL name scheme

2004-11-29 Thread Hans Schou
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Darren Duncan wrote: Considering that it sounds like you want to embed your DBURL implementation into the DBI interface spec itself, then why is DBI-specificity a problem? Oops, wrong answer before. I want to use DBURL with the command line tools psql and mysql.

Re: DBDI website?

2004-11-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Tim Bunce wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:01:23PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: I wanted to point someone to the DBDI project, but didn't find anything but http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are there plans for dbdi.perl.org or something like that? Yes, once there's something other than