Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread John Scoles
David E. Wheeler wrote: Fellow DBIers, With a bit of help from me, Tim added a new feature to the DBI yesterday: AutoInactiveDestroy. I wrote the test for it. The test, however, forks. We need to make sure that it doesn't die an ugly death on systems without fork (and on Win32, where it's

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 27, 2010, at 5:01 AM, John Scoles wrote: Which test is it exactly?? t/16destroy.t Ok here you go Windblows XP home SP3 Visual C++ 2003 here is the output from the nmake test Thanks! t/01basics.t ... ok t/02dbidrv.t ... ok t/03handle.t

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread John Scoles
David E. Wheeler wrote: ok here you go with Debug set to 15 t/zvp_16destroy.t .. DBI 1.613 (PurePerl) dispatch trace level set to 15 C:\dbi\trunk\blib\lib/DBI/PurePerl.pm version 2.014285 t/zvp_16destroy.t .. 1/20 - DBI-install_driver(Test) for MSWin32 perl=5.0100

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: Test has no driver CLONE() function so is unsafe threaded FAILED tests 19-20 Failed 2/20 tests, 90.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread John Scoles
David E. Wheeler wrote: now we are getting t/zvp_16destroy.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 20 tests but ran 18. t/zvxgp_16destroy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 20 tests but ran 18. Files=171, Tests=6280,

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:17 AM, John Scoles wrote: David E. Wheeler wrote: now we are getting t/zvp_16destroy.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 20 tests but ran 18. t/zvxgp_16destroy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 18 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Bad plan.

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread John Scoles
David E. Wheeler wrote: Ah what do you want that for It will just mess up your email ;) t/zvp_16destroy.t .. 1/20 - DBI-install_driver(Test) for MSWin32 perl=5.0100 01 pid=2200 ruid=0 euid=0 install_driver: DBD::Test version undef loaded from dummy New DBI::dr (for

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread David E. Wheeler
Okay, something funky with threads on Win32 I guess. Any ideas, Tim? 'Cause I'm fresh out. Best, David On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:52 AM, John Scoles wrote: Ah what do you want that for It will just mess up your email ;) t/zvp_16destroy.t .. 1/20 - DBI-install_driver(Test) for

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread Martin J. Evans
David E. Wheeler wrote: On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: Test has no driver CLONE() function so is unsafe threaded FAILED tests 19-20 Failed 2/20 tests, 90.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread Martin J. Evans
Martin J. Evans wrote: David E. Wheeler wrote: On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: Test has no driver CLONE() function so is unsafe threaded FAILED tests 19-20 Failed 2/20 tests, 90.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed

Re: Please Test: AutoInactiveDestroy

2010-07-27 Thread Cosimo Streppone
In data 26 luglio 2010 alle ore 23:11:42, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com ha scritto: [...] AutoInactiveDestroy. We need to make sure that it doesn't die an ugly death on systems without fork (and on Win32, where it's emulated). It seems to die an ugly death for me. I'm