Re: 51dbm_file.t problems in latest development release

2010-09-08 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans martin.ev...@easysoft.com:  After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted: 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still connected so the files

Re: 51dbm_file.t problems in latest development release

2010-09-08 Thread Martin J. Evans
On 08/09/10 08:58, Jens Rehsack wrote: 2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans martin.ev...@easysoft.com: After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted: 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a

Re: 51dbm_file.t problems in latest development release

2010-09-08 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/8 Martin J. Evans martin.ev...@easysoft.com: On 08/09/10 08:58, Jens Rehsack wrote: 2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans martin.ev...@easysoft.com:  After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted: 1.

51dbm_file.t problems in latest development release

2010-09-07 Thread Martin J. Evans
After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted: 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still connected so the files are still open and this fails on Windows. I don't see

Re: 51dbm_file.t problems in latest development release

2010-09-07 Thread Martin J. Evans
On 07/09/2010 19:57, Martin J. Evans wrote: After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted: 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still connected so the files are