On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:24:40PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:47:39 +, Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:08:08AM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
I had certainly managed to miss this change - which could easily
account for some of
Sorry for this flurry of half-researched questions... :-(
I'll probably be able to submit another patch to DBI::DBD.pm out of this.
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:11:57 +, Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:24:40PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Sorry for this flurry of half-researched questions... :-(
I'll probably be able to submit another patch to DBI::DBD.pm out of this.
Great! Thanks.
Tim.
p.s. Patch against subversion if possible. If not grab the latest
from
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:08:08AM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
I had certainly managed to miss this change - which could easily
account for some of the weirdnesses I'd been seeing in DBD::Informix.
(I haven't had a chance to do a thing for a week and more.) This sort
of backwards
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:47:39 +, Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:08:08AM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
I had certainly managed to miss this change - which could easily
account for some of the weirdnesses I'd been seeing in DBD::Informix.
(I haven't had a
DBI 1.31 suggests that lexically scoped variables should
be passed to _new_dbh():
http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI/Changes#Changes_in_DBI_1.31,_29th_November_2002
DBI 1.33 suggests that drivers should no longer pass these
variables to _new_drh() or _new_dbh():
Thanks, applied.
Tim.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:12:54AM +0100, Steffen Goeldner wrote:
DBI 1.31 suggests that lexically scoped variables should
be passed to _new_dbh():
http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI/Changes#Changes_in_DBI_1.31,_29th_November_2002
DBI 1.33 suggests that drivers
I had certainly managed to miss this change - which could easily
account for some of the weirdnesses I'd been seeing in DBD::Informix.
(I haven't had a chance to do a thing for a week and more.) This sort
of backwards incompatible change (in the use of set_err()) stuff needs
to be firmly
