John Scoles wrote:
> Well story two of the 'two bit' version of DBD::Oracle 1.25
>
> You can find release candidate 2 here
>
> http://svn.perl.org/modules/dbd-oracle/trunk/DBD-Oracle-1.25-RC2.tar.gz
>
> This one has some minor changes from Martin Evans, though I could not
> find any issues with
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:12:48 +0200, David E. Wheeler
wrote:
On Aug 7, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
My really *ignorant* wild guess is that "exit" just avoids the
troubles bits of DESTROY() that are causing segfaults
without actually solving the problem.
So the issue is that i
On Aug 9, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
>>package Foo;
>>sub DESTROY { exit; }
>>my $foo = bless {}, 'Foo';
>
> I couldn't try this yet, but, I don't think this
> would segfault.
>
> What I *guess* happens is that the 'exit' will cause
> the script to immediately exit, sk
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:12:48 +0200, David E. Wheeler
> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 7, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> >
> >> My really *ignorant* wild guess is that "exit" just avoids the
> >> troubles bits of DESTROY() that are causing segfaults
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> I tried to look into this on the weekend, but ran out of time. I didn't
> get *any* segfaults though, neither from 16destroy.t nor from any of the
> samples below.
>
> I *did* only get 18 passing tests instead of 20 from 16destroy.t though.
Yes, I
The next European PostgreSQL day is going to be between 6-8 December
in Stuttgart, Germany.
http://www.pgday.eu/
It seems like a very cool conference and it might be interesting to
offer some Perl related talks there.
It might be interesting to talk on how to use Pg from Perl,
DBIx::Class or PgTAP
In data 09 agosto 2010 alle ore 17:27:52, David E. Wheeler
ha scritto:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
package Foo;
sub DESTROY { exit; }
my $foo = bless {}, 'Foo';
I couldn't try this yet, but, I don't think this
would segfault.
What I *guess* happens is tha
On Aug 9, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
>> Which nasty part?
>
> Ehm... scrap that :)
> Your patch with 'unless' reversed to 'if' works fine.
Thanks! Committed in r14317.
> Just for clarity, here's the full DESTROY() of 16destroy.t:
Yep, thanks.
>>> Will try and let you know.
>>
In data 09 agosto 2010 alle ore 22:42:59, David E. Wheeler
ha scritto:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Which nasty part?
Ehm... scrap that :)
Your patch with 'unless' reversed to 'if' works fine.
Thanks! Committed in r14317.
Confirmed. r14317 passes all tests.
--
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Tim, I think we're ready for another dev release, especially since I added
> this test to the MANIFEST.
Running tests on the latest ActivePerl shows 2 issues:
1) t/01basics.t fails to load DBD::Oracle (because I don't have the Oracle
client
libr
On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> Tim, I think we're ready for another dev release, especially since I added
>> this test to the MANIFEST.
>
> Running tests on the latest ActivePerl shows 2 issues:
>
> 1) t/01basics.t fails to load D
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, Jan Dubois wrote:
>
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > Tim, I think we're ready for another dev release, especially since I added
> > this test to the MANIFEST.
>
> Running tests on the latest ActivePerl shows 2 issues:
Sorry, forgot to mention one "untidine
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> >> Tim, I think we're ready for another dev release, especially since I added
> >> this test to the MANIFEST.
> >
> > Running tests on the latest Activ
13 matches
Mail list logo
