Add Unicode Support to the DBI

2011-09-09 Thread David E. Wheeler
DBIers, tl;dr: I think it's time to add proper Unicode support to the DBI. What do you think it should look like? Background I've brought this up a time or two in the past, but a number of things have happened lately to make me think that it was again time: First, on the DBD::Pg list, we've

Re: Add Unicode Support to the DBI

2011-09-09 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 One thing I see bandied about a lot is that Perl 5.14 is highly preferred. However, it's not clear exactly what the gains are and how bad 5.12 is compared to 5.14, how bad 5.10 is, how bad 5.8 is, etc. Right now 5.8 is the required minimum

Re: Add Unicode Support to the DBI

2011-09-09 Thread Darren Duncan
Another wrinkle to this is the fact that identifiers in the database, such as column names and such, are also character data, and have an encoding. So for any DBMSs that support Unicode identifiers (as I believe a complete one should, even if they have to be quoted in SQL) or identifiers with