On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:27:24PM +, Dave Mitchell wrote:
>
> The second patch, which makes DBIS more efficient, is a lot more complex,
> and more likely to break things (especially as it's changing a bunch of
> macros that are directly #included by the DBD drivers. You may need to
> bump API
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:11:17PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:27:24PM +, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> I'm concerned that changing the API, and thus forcing all compiled
> drivers to be recompiled at the same time the DBI is installed,
> isn't worth the gain. Especially as dr
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:23:30PM +, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> I'd be happy in principle, although some guidance would be welcome
Also in particular, what needs to continue happening across an API
change? Is it just that a driver, compiled and installed against an old
DBI, must continue to work
