On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tim Bunce wrote:
If you're trying to create a wider standard with support in vendor
tools then best to come back when there's wider support and some
implementations existing.
Good idea. I'll do that.
Alternatively write a DBI subclass to do-the-right-thing.
I could
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Hans Schou wrote:
But making dbi:// a default prefix will probably restrict the use of
DBURL to only DBI. It is not realistic to think that MySQL and
PostgreSQL would implement such a naming scheme, where as the original
idea might be accepted.
Considering that it sounds
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Darren Duncan wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Hans Schou wrote:
But making dbi:// a default prefix will probably restrict the use of
DBURL to only DBI. It is not realistic to think that MySQL and
PostgreSQL would implement such a naming scheme, where as the original
idea
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Darren Duncan wrote:
Considering that it sounds like you want to embed your DBURL
implementation into the DBI interface spec itself, then why is
DBI-specificity a problem?
Oops, wrong answer before. I want to use DBURL with the command line
tools psql and mysql.
