Jared Still wrote:
I use a (Perl) password server for this.
Passwords are stored encrypted in a configuration file.
Clients authenticate with the server, and receive a requested
password (encrypted) across the network, if the client is
entitled.
The user authentication is rudimentary, but it
Still late to the party - another one bullet point item...
On 7/4/05, Darren Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. All host parameters should be named (like :foo) rather than
positional (like ?), meeting with the SQL:2003 standard. The named
format is a lot easier to use and flexible, making
At 12:35 AM -0700 7/9/05, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
I dunno which DBMS support prepare without a database connection,
but I would expect all the mainstream databases to require a
database connection. IBM DB2 does; IBM Informix Dynamic Server
(IDS) does; someone else commented on this and said
At 1:03 AM -0700 7/9/05, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Can you explain which parts of the SQL:2003 mandate this notation?
I've had a moderately good poke around my copy of ISO/IEC
9075-2:2003 (SQL/Foundation) and cannot find this. I'd like a few
section numbers listed which describe this.
The
At 1:22 AM -0700 7/9/05, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
On 7/4/05, Darren Duncan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. All details used to construct a connection handle should be
completely decomposed rather than shoved into an ungainly data
source. Examples of what should be distinct
Jonathan Leffler wrote:
I dunno which DBMS support prepare without a database connection, but I
would expect all the mainstream databases to require a database connection.
+1
I'm also far from convinced that there's any significant benefit in
separating the 'create a database handle' from
Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Can you explain which parts of the SQL:2003 mandate this notation? I've had
a moderately good poke around my copy of ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003
(SQL/Foundation) and cannot find this. I'd like a few section numbers listed
which describe this.
I second that one too. Besides,
Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Oh drat - not the DBI connection string discussion again!
;-)
Excellent, that does it: thanks!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Leffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dbi-users
Subject: Re: Installing DBD::File via CPAN
Do you use 'UNINST=1' in the build options for
Jonathan, while you are well-meaning in your comments, you are
mis-reading what I have said multiple times and are therefore making
a straw man argument against it.
Regarding this point:
5. All details used to construct a connection handle should be
completely decomposed rather than shoved
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:08:33 -0700, Dean Arnold wrote:
Hi Dean
Just a comment:
Or, it gives us the opportunity to coax people to upgrade their
perl versions ;^). And of course, just cuz its CORE, doesn't
I know we agree on some things, Dean, but this is a can of wormskis, as we say
in
11 matches
Mail list logo
