Hi Chris,
Chris Bizer wrote:
Hi Hugh and Richard,
interesting discussion indeed.
I think that the basic idea of the Semantic Web is that you reuse existing
terms or at least provide mappings from your terms to existing ones.
As DBpedia is often used as an interlinking hub between
Hello John,
John Goodwin wrote:
Regarding you arguments:
Too tight restrictions: Which ones specifically are too
tight? If the restrictions cause inconsistencies (which they
are likely to do at the moment), then this is a signal a
problem in the DBpedia data. (Which is one of the
www.georgikobilarov.com
-Original Message-
From: Jens Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:30 PM
To: Vanessa Lopez
Cc: dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including
DBpedia Ontology and RDF links
; dbpedia-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Goodwin
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including
DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase
Jens Lehmann wrote:
Hello John,
John Goodwin wrote:
Thanks Chris and team for all your hard work getting this done. I
do,
however
]; Semantic Web; Sean Bechhofer; dbpedia-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including
DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase
Hello,
John Goodwin wrote:
John's comment relates to (at least) the axioms on publisher:
The semantics of range mean
Juan Sequeda wrote:
As anybody considered reusing the DBpedia ontology?
Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student
Research Assistant
Dept. of Computer Sciences
The University of Texas at Austin
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda http://www.cs.utexas.edu/%7Ejsequeda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
John,
Here's an observation from a bystander ...
On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:17, John Goodwin wrote:
snip
This is also a good example of where (IMHO) the domain was perhaps
over specified. For example all sorts of things could have
publishers, and not the ones listed here. I worry that if you
Ontology is designed to put all things in their natural places, not to
make mess of the real world;
Most people don't care about structure, they care about content.
DBpedia makes Wikipedia's implicit structure explicit in order to make
its content more accessible and (re)usable.
That's it.
2008/11/18 Chris Bizer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hugh and Richard,
interesting discussion indeed.
I think that the basic idea of the Semantic Web is that you reuse existing
terms or at least provide mappings from your terms to existing ones.
As DBpedia is often used as an interlinking hub
Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
Ontology is designed to put all things in their natural places, not to
make mess of the real world;
Most people don't care about structure, they care about content.
DBpedia makes Wikipedia's implicit structure explicit in order to make
its content more
10 matches
Mail list logo
