Hello,
Paul Houle schrieb:
Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well?
It can be converted of course:
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.2/en/dbpedia-ontology.nt
Kind regards,
Jens
--
Dipl. Inf. Jens Lehmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Homepage:
Jens Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
Paul Houle schrieb:
Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well?
It can be converted of course:
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.2/en/dbpedia-ontology.nt
Kind regards,
Jens
I ran it through a converter last night and got a
Hello,
Paul Houle schrieb:
Jens Lehmann wrote:
I ran it through a converter last night and got a document that,
like yours, contained blank nodes. These are implicit in the RDF-XML,
but need to be named in order to be serialized as NT. That's one
substantial difference between
A minor inconsistency I've noticed in dbpedia is that the OWL
ontology is represented in RDF/XML, while the rest of dbpedia is in NT.
I like NT. I've got a special-purpose NT parser that works very
well with dbpedia. (I found that many commercial OS RDF tools can't
handle the
Paul Houle wrote:
A minor inconsistency I've noticed in dbpedia is that the OWL
ontology is represented in RDF/XML, while the rest of dbpedia is in NT.
I like NT. I've got a special-purpose NT parser that works very
well with dbpedia. (I found that many commercial OS RDF tools
