Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Georgi Kobilarov
Kingsley, What's the URL of the strict one? We are building a DBpedia installer for Virtuoso, so at the very least I want the users of this installer to have choice of strict or loose infobox extraction. Not publicly available yet. There was a buggy first version of strict, but we

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Georgi Kobilarov
In the future, there will be a user interface for specifying domains/ranges. (Georgi is working on it.) We hope that the quality of the schema will increase over time. exactly, we want to enable the community to maintain the dbpedia ontology. let's see how community agreement on a broad

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Juan Sequeda wrote: As anybody considered reusing the DBpedia ontology? Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student Research Assistant Dept. of Computer Sciences The University of Texas at Austin http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda http://www.cs.utexas.edu/%7Ejsequeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Richard Cyganiak
John, Here's an observation from a bystander ... On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:17, John Goodwin wrote: snip This is also a good example of where (IMHO) the domain was perhaps over specified. For example all sorts of things could have publishers, and not the ones listed here. I worry that if you

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Georgi Kobilarov
Ontology is designed to put all things in their natural places, not to make mess of the real world; Most people don't care about structure, they care about content. DBpedia makes Wikipedia's implicit structure explicit in order to make its content more accessible and (re)usable. That's it.

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Ansell
2008/11/18 Chris Bizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Hugh and Richard, interesting discussion indeed. I think that the basic idea of the Semantic Web is that you reuse existing terms or at least provide mappings from your terms to existing ones. As DBpedia is often used as an interlinking hub

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Georgi Kobilarov wrote: Ontology is designed to put all things in their natural places, not to make mess of the real world; Most people don't care about structure, they care about content. DBpedia makes Wikipedia's implicit structure explicit in order to make its content more

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Domain and range are useful Re: DBpedia 3.2 release, including DBpedia Ontology and RDF links to Freebase

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Ansell
2008/11/18 Tim Berners-Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2008-11 -17, at 11:27, John Goodwin wrote: [...] I'd be tempted to generalise or just remove the domain/range restrictions. Any thoughts? There are lots of uses for rand and domain. One is in the user interface -- if you for example link a

[Dbpedia-discussion] Important request...

2008-11-17 Thread Haytham el-fadeel
Hi all developer, I 'm new in this mail list and I hope we help each other. Then I have a request. I need a links from every English resource (article) to all exists other languages, that usually exist in the left side of wikipedia page. I was think to develop a piece of code and run it