Thanks Tom.
We started thinking in our Intro about firewalls, and in the process
picked up a lot of text on NATs. We *did* intend to write in terms of
DCCP client and server, so let us know what we got wrong.
We could be happy to split the NAT stuff towards the NAT draft, when and
if that
Hi Gorry,
What I meant to suggest is that I see this draft as a part of a bigger
picture -- a picture that might be split between DCCP and BEHAVE, sure.
I hope we can have a good discussion about NAT issues tomorrow.
As far as client/server confusion, for example, scenario 2:
2. Public
