Re: [dccp] WGLC comments for draft-ietf-dccp-dtls-04

2008-01-15 Thread Gorry Fairhurst
See also in-line comments from me (this has opened some new questions on the text). Phelan, Tom wrote: Hi Pasi, Thanks for the careful reading and comments. See inline... Tom P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008

[dccp] Comments on draft-ietf-dccp-dtls-04.txt

2008-01-15 Thread Gorry Fairhurst
I have the following comments, which I'd like to be taken into consideration during this WGLC: There are two issues I'd like clarified: --- Page 7, section 3.5, para 2. Alternatively, DTLS over DCCP implemenations MAY choose to use its own PMTU Discovery... - The recent comments from Pasi,

[dccp] [Fwd: Invited review: draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-03.txt?]

2008-01-15 Thread Gorry Fairhurst
Vladimir, said I could forward this to the authors and list. To remind people, we're expecting a revised I-D that addresses the comments from the reviewers and any from this list. We then hope to be able to start a WGLC. Best wishes, Gorry (DCCP WG Co-Chair) Hello Gorry, I have not

[dccp] Re: CCID-4 Implementor Feedback - Questions?

2008-01-15 Thread Sally Floyd
Gorry - Ah dear. My apologies at being more than a month late at getting to these. During the WG meeting today we looked at the following set of questions posed by implementors. Could people in the working group please look at these questions and see if they are able to help with answers?