Gorry -
I have two questions, that relates to RFC3448 v. RFC 5348:
* There is also a citation of [RFC4342Errat] - which I think used to
be referenced from:
We don't expect that errata would be added to CCID
3 that didn't apply to CCID 4, but if this should happen, we would
say
Sally,
This is great, many thanks. I am pleased to see this is again
progressing, and suggest we put this on the agenda for the DCCP meeting
in San Francisco.
I hope we can upload this soon after the I-D archives re-open on
2009-03-24. I have some comments below.
Best wishes,
Gorry
---
Gorry -
Here are my comments on CCID-4 rev 0-02,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid4-02
Many thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately, I missed the
deadline for submitting the revised draft, but it is available at:
"http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid4-03.txt";
"h
Authors, WG,
Here are my comments on CCID-4 rev 0-02,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid4-02
Best wishes,
Gorry
Overall:
- The document will need revised boiler plate to address new IETF rules
for I-D submission.
Abstract:
- It's good to say also that this experimental
