. In
fact, it might do more harm than good with some braindead port-preserving
NATs: random source port are more likely to work there.
Best regards,
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis
Transport: header.
In pure SDP context, a new m=protocol is required for DCCP/UDP. I don't see a
particular need to support both encapsulated and non-encapsulated cases.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
of an API (it would not need to be
normative).
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
how to build an API that works with the current
proposal, that's why I'm concerned.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
