Hi Pasi,
See inline...
Tom P.
-Original Message-
From: Pasi Sarolahti [mailto:pasi.sarola...@iki.fi]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 PM
To: Phelan, Tom
Cc: DCCP working group
Subject: Re: [dccp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-00.txt
Hi Tom,
Here are some personal
-Original Message-
From: Phelan, Tom [mailto:tphe...@sonusnet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 7:52 AM
To: Dan Wing; Pasi Sarolahti; DCCP working group
Cc: draft-ietf-dccp-udpen...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dccp] dccp-udpencap discussed in TSVWG
Hi Dan,
Good comments
On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Phelan, Tom wrote:
Have the benefits vs. disadvantages of defining a different DCCP
header for UDP encapsulation been discussed earlier? The current
method saves some redundant header space, but may add to
implementation complexity in the DCCP side. I can't say if
