Author: mvdb
Date: Sat Mar 11 07:36:01 2006
New Revision: 385093
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=385093view=rev
Log:
Apply patch provided by Carlos Sanchesz (DDLUTILS-58).
Just changes the version of the parent pom to 1 instead of 1.0
Thanx for the patch.
Modified:
Author: tomdz
Date: Sat Mar 11 07:37:15 2006
New Revision: 385095
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=385095view=rev
Log:
Added attribute to the DatabaseToDdlTask that allows to specify the name of the
model read from the database
Modified:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DDLUTILS-56?page=comments#action_12369998
]
Martin van den Bemt commented on DDLUTILS-56:
-
Thomas what is your pov about this ?
I am in favor of adding components per database implementation and maybe
Hi everyone,
Was kind of inactive lately, since I was moving jobs and because of some private things that needed
my attention. Not saying that I am back at full strength yet, but will definitely have a lot more
time for ddlutils and other projects I am involved with :)
Mvgr,
Martin
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DDLUTILS-56?page=comments#action_1236
]
Thomas Dudziak commented on DDLUTILS-56:
I think per database is too much, that's what the environment field is for, and
it does not provide us any real benefit.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DDLUTILS-56?page=comments#action_12370013
]
Ken Weiner commented on DDLUTILS-56:
Having components per db implementation would make it much easier for people
who use DdlUtils primarily with one database to track