Jan. 18



MISSISSIPPI:

Solving Kathy Mabry's Murder: Brutal 15-Year-Old Crime Highlights Decades-Long Mississippi Scandal


J.D. "Bubba" Roseman, the first black sheriff of Humphreys County, is a convivial man. In his office and in casual conversations on the street in this town of 2,200, he engages people quickly and easily, inquiring about a son on the football team, a niece in college or a grandmother in the hospital. He talks loud and fast, always smiling, and works a deep, infectious laugh into just about every conversation.

But when Roseman, 57, talks about Kathy Mabry, the mirth drains from his face. His brow straightens. He speaks softly. He pauses from time to time to swallow the catch that latches onto his words, and his eyes sometimes well up. It's an unexpected thing from a stout man wearing a gun.

Mabry was murdered here in 1997 at the age of 39. This part of America once produced murder ballads about brutal crimes like this one -- blues greats like Pinetop Perkins, Elmore James and Sonny Boy Williamson have all called Humphreys County home.

Kathy Mabry's killer raped her, then slashed her face, head and throat with a rusty razor blade. She was left to bleed to death on the floor of a vacant house. "I think about that case every day," Roseman says. "I told Kathy's momma I wouldn't get an honest night's rest until we got the man who did this."

Roseman was the Belzoni police chief back then, the first black man elected to that position as well. His election to both positions shows just how much the region has changed over the past half century. In what may have been the first assassination of the civil rights era, the Rev. George Lee was murdered here in 1955 while registering blacks to vote. In those years, white citizen councils beat civil rights volunteers with such frequency that the town earned the nickname "Bloody Belzoni."

Today, Humphreys (population: about 9,000) is the 7th-poorest county in America's poorest state. The poverty rate here approaches 40 %. But it's also a close-knit community, where families go back several generations or more. Violent crime is rare. The county saw all of 1 murder in 2012. "It just doesn't happen that often here," Roseman says.

Mabry's murder stunned people here in part because it was so unexpected, but also because it was so unspeakably vicious. "She came from a quiet, respected family," Roseman says. "They're well-liked. Most folks around here hadn't ever experienced that kind of murder. So it shook the town. It's still shaking the town."

The case went unsolved for 15 years, until December, after a casual courtroom conversation led lawyers from the Mississippi Innocence Project to investigate it. That 2 attorneys for an organization better known for getting the wrongly convicted out of prison would take it upon themselves to solve a cold case is remarkable enough. Their search covered the state, from Columbus in the northeast, to Oxford in the northwest, to the crime lab in Jackson, to a dusty attic in the Humphreys County courthouse, deep in the belly of the Delta.

The reason they felt compelled to act is part of a larger scandal currently unfolding in Mississippi. The original police investigation into Mabry's murder hinged on the forensic analysis of Steven Hayne, a longtime Mississippi medical examiner, and Michael West, a dentist and self-proclaimed bite-mark expert. Hayne was a doctor in private practice who at the time performed nearly all of the state's autopsies. West was one of his frequent collaborators. The 2 men have been at the heart of the Mississippi death investigation system for two decades. West has testified in dozens of cases, Hayne in thousands, including a number of death penalty cases.

Media investigations over the years, however, including my own for The Huffington Post and Reason magazine, have revealed that both Hayne and West have contributed critical evidence that led to the convictions of people who were later exonerated, and routinely and flagrantly flouted the ethical and professional standards of their respective fields. West, for example, once claimed he could match the bite marks in a half-eaten bologna sandwich found at a murder scene to the teeth of the prime suspect. In a more recent case, Hayne claimed the bullet wounds in a murder victim showed that 2 people held the gun when it was fired, not one. In the Mabry case, West used bite-mark analysis to nab an innocent man for Mabry's murder. That man spent nearly a year in jail. But the Mabry story also shows that the victims in this scandal include not just the wrongly accused, but the families of the victims, the future victims of the actual perpetrators, public officials like Roseman, and even entire towns.

Mississippi officials have thus far resisted calls for a thorough review of Hayne and West's work. In particular, the Mississippi Supreme Court has shown little concern over the possibility that Hayne and West may have put an untold number of innocents behind the razor wire at Parchman penitentiary. Neither has Attorney General Jim Hood, whose office continues to defend convictions won primarily on the testimony one or both of the men have given on the witness stand. To concede there's a problem would implicate many state officials who used the 2 men during tenures as prosecutors. It would also open hundreds, perhaps thousands of cases to review.

Tucker Carrington, the director of the Mississippi Innocence Project, says he and his colleague Will McIntosh decided to pursue Mabry's killer themselves after they attempted to bring the case to the attention of the prosecutor in Humphreys County, and then to Hood's office, and received no response from either.

"When you take on a case and it reveals a glaring injustice like this -- something that could easily be taken care of if someone would just give it some attention -- you can't just turn a blind eye to that," Carrington says. "In the end, I guess we saw this through because no one else would."

The defensiveness and nonchalance of Mississippi officials over the possible wrongful conviction, imprisonment and execution of innocent people is troubling enough. (Neither Hayne nor Hood's office responded to an interview request. The Huffington Post was unable to reach West.) But the Mabry case shows that the harm Hayne and West have done goes deeper. The same problems that allowed for the conviction of innocents have also left brutal crimes unsolved, leaving those affected to grieve and worry, with little hope of closure.

"Good people live here. They deserve to feel safe," Roseman says. "I took it personal."

And there's another corresponding harm when the innocent are implicated: The guilty often go free. Indeed, Mabry's murderer went on to kill again.

Julie Mae Wilson last saw her daughter around 7 p.m. on Saturday, March 22, 1997. "She had just cooked up some fish for the boys and said she had to go out for a while," Wilson says. "She said she'd be back in an hour or so. I never did see her again."

Wilson has lived in Humphreys County all her life. The drive down historic Highway 61 from Memphis, Tenn., to her hometown of Isola slices through the sort of harsh, agrestic beauty for which the Mississippi Delta is known. There are scenes of crushing poverty, gooey marshes and quiet bucolic landscapes. The route south backtracks the great black migration of the middle of the 20th century, when Delta sharecroppers traveled upriver in pursuit of better lives in Detroit, Indianapolis and Chicago. Like its neighbors, Humphreys County lost a good chunk of its population then; it still grows smaller with each census.

Wilson and her husband, now deceased, spent most of their working lives in cotton fields. The 2 had 8 children, including Mabry, and led the typically hardscrabble lives of black farm workers in the civil rights era.

Today cotton has given way to a new business in the area: catfish -- raising them, processing them, eating them and celebrating them. Two-thirds of America's farm-raised catfish are grown within an hour of Belzoni. It's home to the World Catfish Festival and the "Miss Catfish" pageant. At the moment, the downtown features a collection of ceramic flatheads painted in different getups -- overalls, fur coats, top hats -- for "Catfish on Parade," a down-home take on Chicago's popular "Bulls on Parade" public art exhibit. There's also hope that the new "Delta Blues Trail" will bring tourists down from the casinos in Tunica to explore the legacy of the music borne of the area's troubled past.

But the residents of the county, now about 70 % black, still continue to struggle economically. All of Wilson's children have left the area and now live in Chicago with their families. She had hoped for better things for Mabry, too. She graduated from high school and had started college, but picked up a drug habit soon after.

"Kathy came up when things started to get better around here," Wilson says. "We had spent a lot of years chopping cotton. But I was working [as a maid] in houses by then. My husband was driving tractors," Wilson says. "But she didn't last long in college before she got into the drugs. Wasn't long before she was back at home."

Mabry battled her crack addiction for the rest of her life. She had some periods of sobriety. She married and had two sons. But her struggle with addiction eventually dissolved the marriage and dashed any hope of going back to school. She fell into a series of abusive relationships. She and her boys moved in with her mother in Isola, the tiny town of 900 people about 10 miles south of Belzoni.

The last of those abusive relationships was with James Earl Gates, who was 48 at the time of the murder. "He was no good," Wilson says. "Broke her arm once. They were in some kind of love, but he had a short, short temper. He would come in here, into my home, and take over like he was the man of the house. I'm just an old lady. Kathy was tiny. The boys were young. There wasn't much we could do about him."

Mabry didn't come home after making dinner for her boys that Saturday night in 1997. When she hadn't returned by late Sunday morning, Wilson began to worry. She knew about her daughter's drug problem, but Mabry had of late managed to handle her addiction while still taking care of her boys and working at the Confish catfish plant. She wasn't one to disappear without a phone call.

On Monday morning, Gates called Wilson to ask if she knew where Mabry was. He'd called Mabry several times over the weekend, he said, and she hadn't picked up. Until then Wilson had worried, but just assumed her daughter had been with Gates. Now she was panicked. She called Roseman and asked him to look for Mabry in Belzoni. Roseman checked around town. No one had seen her.

At 5:30 the following morning, a truck driver named Junior Mitchell pulled his rig up to his house, to fill up from the diesel pump in the front yard. Mitchell had moved out of the place several months earlier to live with his girlfriend, but still came by from time to time to get gas and check on his property. The house had been burglarized several times since he left, and on more than a few occasions he had shooed away drug addicts he found squatting inside. The vacated building had become a gathering spot for them over the winter months.

That morning, March 25, Mitchell noticed that a wall panel under the carport had been kicked out. When he approached the front door to investigate, he saw a trail of blood. He followed the trail inside and discovered Mabry's body.

The murder set the entire community on edge. "You might see someone getting shot after an argument or something, but even that is really rare," says Dim Pyle, the mayor of Isola. "Nobody had ever seen anything like this. Because of the closeness everybody had with Kathy's family, the whole town, both towns, well, we were all just devastated."

The county coroner, Roseman and John Allen Jones, who was the Humphreys County sheriff at the time, arrived at the crime scene about an hour after Mitchell found Mabry's body. Jones called the Mississippi Highway Patrol, who sent an investigator and two inspectors from the state crime lab. They began interviewing suspects that afternoon.

Mabry's body was sent to Steven Hayne for an autopsy. Though he held no official state position, and was never board certified in forensic pathology, between the early 1990s and the late 2000s, Hayne performed 80-90 % of the autopsies in Mississippi, according to his own testimony in trials and depositions. That amounted to an astonishing 1,500 to 1,800 autopsies per year.

The National Association of Medical Examiners recommends that a single doctor perform no more than 250 autopsies per year. The organization refuses to certify any lab where an individual doctor performs more than 325 per year. Hayne's workload could result in some odd autopsy reports. According to a complaint filed by the Mississippi Innocence Project, in one case Hayne included in his report the weight of a man's spleen, and made comments about its appearance. The problem: The man's spleen had been removed four years before he died. In an autopsy on a drowned infant, Hayne noted the weight of each of the child's kidneys, even though one of them had previously been removed. In another murder case, Hayne noted in his report that he had removed and examined the decedent's ovaries and uterus. The victim was a man.

Mississippi's autopsy system had long been loaded with bad incentives. Because prosecutors and the elected coroners assigned autopsies on a case-by-case basis, doctors had a strong incentive to tell them what they wanted to hear so that they could benefit from future referrals. Sometimes, critics say, pleasing prosecutors meant providing them with findings that would lead to convictions. Other times, it might mean presenting conclusions that cleared a police officer or prison guard when a suspect or inmate died under suspicious circumstances.

The state has made some progress in recent years, requiring that anyone who performs an autopsy for prosecutors be board certified, and Mississippi now has a credentialed state medical examiner. But the damage from the old system is ongoing. It was a system almost designed for abuse. "If hadn't been Hayne," the Innocence Project's Carrington says, "it would have been someone else."

Hayne performed most of his autopsies not in the state-of-the-art crime lab in Jackson, but in the basement of a funeral home owned by longtime Rankin County Coroner Jimmy Roberts. One former state official who had visited Hayne's operation on several occasions likened it to "a sausage factory." Another said that in 2006 he watched Hayne and his assistants eat pork sandwiches and smoke cigars while cutting up multiple bodies at once. For much of his career he held 2 full-time jobs during the day. So he did most of his autopsies at night, giving his practice a sort of macabre mystique.

One person often present at those all-night autopsy sessions was Michael West, a dentist in Hattiesburg. West often assisted with Hayne's autopsies, and sometimes videotaped them. The two men also wrote articles together, and by the early 1990s, West had established a reputation as either an ingenious forensic specialist far ahead of his time, or a charlatan, depending on whom you asked.

The police investigating Mabry's murder rounded up about half a dozen men who'd been in or near the vacant house around the time of her death and held them for questioning. Roseman and Jones initially focused on a man named Douglas Myers, an addict who'd been in the house and had a fresh scratch on his face the afternoon of the investigation.

"He couldn't give us a good answer for that scratch," Roseman says. But the state officials seemed interested in James Earl Gates, especially after learning that he had beaten Mabry before.

Despite the history of abuse between Gates and Mabry, Roseman never liked Gates for the murder. "If she had been choked, or had hit her head, if she'd been dumped out in a field somewhere, I'd say, 'Okay, that makes sense.' I could see putting that on Gates. Maybe he'd lost his temper again. Maybe he got too rough with her," Roseman says. "But when a man who loves a woman, when he's sleeping with the same woman, he doesn't do her body like that. A mean man will hit a woman he loves, but he won't cut up her face. You just don't see that."

Roseman also says Gates wasn't defensive about Mabry's death. In fact, he seemed crushed. "He showed real strong emotion when he heard she'd been killed," Roseman says. "He didn't try to give us an alibi. We had to ask him where he was. I don't think he even considered the possibility that he could have been a suspect."

He'd soon become the only suspect. During the autopsy, Hayne claimed to have found bite marks on Mabry's body. As he had done in numerous other cases, Hayne then called in West, who claimed to have pioneered a new way of identifying bite marks in human skin, then matching them to 1 person, to the exclusion of anyone else. He called it "The West Phenomenon."

West claimed that only he could perform this method of analysis, which involved yellow goggles and ultraviolet light. He said his method couldn't be tested by anyone else. It couldn't be photographed or recorded on video to be scrutinized by other forensic specialists. At various points in the 1990s, West and the prosecutors who used him in their cases compared his bite-mark genius to musician Itzhak Perlman, Galileo and Jesus Christ. The National Academy of Sciences, however, does not consider bite-mark analysis to be credible as evidence in a trial. And even within the already questionable field of bite-mark analysis, concerns about West were already mounting.

On March 27, 1997, West confirmed that what Hayne had found were indeed bite marks. He took photos of them, then drove to Belzoni to make plaster molds of the suspects' teeth. Using only the plaster molds and the photos of the bite marks he'd brought with him, West excluded all of the men then in custody. For dramatic effect, he used the same line each time: "Sheriff, this is not your man."

The police then escorted West to the home of James Earl Gates, who also allowed West to make an impression of his teeth. West then compared Gates' mold to the photos. In his report, Jones wrote that West next "pointed out to me the similarities between the bite marks and impressions. He informed me that this was a possible suspect."

West then drove back to the morgue to compare the mold of Gates' teeth directly to the marks on Mabry's body. At 12:45 a.m., West called Jones. "This is your man," West said.

On April 1, 1997, James Earl Gates was arrested for the rape and murder of Kathy Mabry. He was booked at the Humphreys County Jail.

MISSISSIPPI'S SLOW-MOTION DISASTER

By 1997, Mississippi officials should have known that West was less than credible. He had already been the subject of unflattering profiles in the ABA Journal and the National Law Journal. He had also been suspended by the American Board of Forensic Odontologists for testifying beyond his expertise, including in the infamous bologna sandwich case. In that case, the defendant was convicted, but the conviction was later overturned when West admitted to disposing of the sandwich after studying it. He said that he had thrown the evidence away because, since no other forensic analyst was qualified to replicate his methods, the sandwich was no longer necessary.

Yet West remained a favorite in Mississippi courtrooms, and among law enforcement officials and prosecutors. In 1999, the Mississippi Supreme Court considered the appeal of Kennedy Brewer, who was on death row for the rape and murder of 3-year-old Christine Jackson 6 years earlier.

As in the Mabry case, Hayne had claimed to find bite marks on the victim's body. He again called in West, who again matched the marks to the dentition of the chief suspect, in this case Brewer, the boyfriend of the girl's mother. In light of the continuing revelations about West, Brewer's attorneys asked the court to overturn the conviction and death sentence, and to suppress West's testimony. In 1997 the court refused. A majority of the justices still believed West possessed the "knowledge, skill, experience, training and education necessary to qualify as an expert in forensic odontology."

West can sound convincing to juries and to those without scientific training. "I should have gone with my instincts about Gates," Roseman says. "But when West showed me the video where he matched the marks, he made a good case. I just thought, this is what the man does every day. All these judges and crime lab folks trust him. He sounds scientific. Who am I to say he's wrong?"

In fact, in Mabry's case West may not have been wrong, at least about the bite marks. Mabry's previous paramours told Roseman that she enjoyed rough sex, including biting. Gates himself admitted to having bitten his girlfriend a few weeks before she died. That, of course, doesn't validate West's methods. Gates may have bitten Mabry, but there was no evidence he bit her on the day she died (indeed, a competent analyst should have recognized that the marks were weeks old). And old bite marks from her boyfriend certainly weren't evidence that he killed her.

In October 1997, Gates' attorney asked Humphreys County Circuit Court Judge Jannie Lewis to suppress West's testimony, citing the mounting questions about West's credibility, and about bite mark evidence in general. Lewis ruled that there was no reason to doubt West's credibility, but he did give Gates funding to hire his own expert to examine the alleged bite marks.

A few months later, District Attorney James Powell sent the scrapings taken from under Mabry's fingernails to the state crime lab in Jackson for DNA testing. At that time, DNA testing was more primitive. A test could exclude someone as a suspect, but couldn't yet match a suspect to biological evidence the way the technology can today.

The tests came back a few weeks later: Kathy Mabry had scratched someone in a frantic fight to save her life, but it wasn't James Earl Gates. In fact, it wasn't any of the men the police had rounded up as suspects -- not even Douglas Myles, the man with the scratch on his cheek.

On Jan. 21, 1998, Powell dismissed the murder charge against Gates. It was now 10 months after the crime. Memories had faded. Some witnesses had left town. And Roseman and Jones were back to square one.

Julie Mae Wilson was crushed when she heard the news. Her daughter's killer was still on the loose, and with so much time now passed, it seemed unlikely he'd ever be found. But she was also terrified. Gates may not have murdered Mabry, but he had shown he could be a violent man. He was now free, likely angry, and almost certainly knew that Wilson had told the police he beat her daughter, which likely made him a suspect in the first place. Roseman and Jones told Gates he wasn't to go anywhere near Wilson, her home, or Mabry's boys without Wilson's permission.

"We didn't see him much after that," Wilson says. "But those first few weeks, we were awful scared."

In the years that followed, Hayne and West continued to apply their questionable brand of forensic analysis to other cases. At the same time, their work also began to attract more scrutiny, though mostly from outside the state.

In 2001, Arizona defense attorney Christopher Plourd tricked West into matching crime scene photos of a bite mark left on a murder victim's breast to a dental mold taken from the mouth of the attorney's own private investigator, who had nothing to do with the crime. After accepting a retainer fee, West confidently sent back a 30-minute video in which he methodically explained how the bite marks in the photos could only have come from the attorney's "suspect."

It was the best evidence to date that West is a charlatan. And yet Mississippi prosecutors still defended convictions won on West's testimony, and Mississippi judges still upheld them.

In 2002, Kennedy Brewer's attorneys were finally able to test the DNA of the semen found in young Christine Jackson's body. The tests showed that the DNA did not belong to Brewer. But rather than release Brewer and declare him innocent, West and District Attorney Forrest Allgood insisted that while someone else may have raped the little girl, West's analysis still clearly showed that Brewer had bitten her.

They posited that perhaps Brewer had held the girl down and bitten her while someone else raped her. Brewer's conviction was overturned, but Allgood promised to try him again. So Brewer remained in prison. Brewer's attorneys next tried to get the DNA profile of Christine Jackson's killer uploaded to state and national databases to see if they could find a match. Allgood fought them every step of the way. (Allgood did not respond to a request for comment.)

In 2004, Tyler Edmonds was convicted of conspiring with his sister to kill her husband. Edmonds was just 13 at the time. The prosecution's theory was that Edmonds and his sister had simultaneously held and fired a gun at the victim while he slept. Hayne testified that he could tell by the bullet wounds in the body that there were two hands on the gun that created them.

But that assertion was too preposterous for the Mississippi Supreme Court. In 2007, the court overturned the verdict -- but also went out of its way to explain that the ruling pertained only to the Edmonds case. The majority made clear that it wasn't questioning Hayne's credentials or credibility in other cases.

The following February, the Innocence Projects of New York and Mississippi, now representing Kennedy Brewer, were finally permitted to search the DNA databases for a match to the semen found in Christine Jackson. The search not only turned up a match, it also found a match to the rape and murder of another little girl in the same county 2 years before Jackson was killed. Hayne and West's testimony had already helped Allgood convict another innocent man, Levon Brooks, for that crime.

The DNA in both cases matched that of 51-year-old Albert Johnson. Johnson was arrested and convicted for both murders. In both cases, Hayne claimed to have found bite marks other doctors had missed and called in West, who matched the alleged bites to the dental molds of the prosecutor's main suspect (who in both cases happened to be the mother's boyfriend). Johnson was initially a suspect in both cases.

Had Hayne and West not been so eager to affirm the hunches of law enforcement, Christine Jackson could well be alive today. Brewer and Brooks were immediately released, having served more than 30 years in prison between them.

Since then, the evidence against Hayne and West has continued to pile up. In 2009, I reported on the case of Jimmie Duncan, who was convicted in Louisiana in 1993 of sexually abusing and murdering the daughter of his girlfriend. That case produced video of West performing one of his notorious bite mark examinations. The video shows him repeatedly jamming a plaster mold he'd made of the suspect's teeth into the skin of the alleged victim, 18-month-old Haley Oliveaux. Jimmie Duncan was still convicted, and is still on death row in Louisiana.

A similar video surfaced in the case of Leigh Stubbs, which The Huffington Post reported on last year. Stubbs was convicted in Mississippi in 2001 of assaulting Janet Kimberly Williams, in what prosecutors hinted may have been a quarrel between lovers. West claimed that he matched bite marks on the victim's hip to Stubbs' teeth, and also testified that lesbians were more likely to bite one another during domestic disputes.

The videotaped examinations in the Duncan and Stubbs cases show that, at best, West was committing malpractice, tampering with evidence and desecrating a corpse. (In the Stubbs case, West may have committed assault, since he performed his analysis on the alleged victim while she was comatose.) At worst, West was using dental molds of the defendants in these cases to create the bite marks he would then testify proved the defendant's guilt.

(source: Huffington Post)






INDIANA:

Trevor McDonald recalls his haunting experience visiting murderers on death row; "I can't get these people out of my head. I see most of them every day. I can't wash those images away"


The names fall from Trevor McDonald's lips as if he were reciting a list of past American presidents. "Ronald Sanford, Frederick Baer, Benjamin Ritchie..." Their faces and their stories are seared into the memory of the veteran newscaster. "I can't get these people out of my head," he confesses. "I see most of them every day. You can't wash them away. I can't wash those images away."

Given the backgrounds of the men in question, it's no surprise. Each is a convicted killer incarcerated in America's Indiana State Prison. 2 of them are on death row, awaiting execution by lethal injection.

McDonald spent 2 weeks in the prison last summer, talking to inmates and their jailers. Journalists can, on occasions, reach for hyperbole a little too casually when promoting their own programmes, but the impact this experience has had on him is unquestionably profound. "It was, in every way, one of the more remarkable things I have ever done. I can't think of anything else which could compare."

Part of his reaction can be attributed to the fact that despite more than 50 years as a journalist, he had never set foot inside a jail until he crossed the threshold of the high-security Indiana prison 50 miles east of Chicago. The average sentence served by each of its 1,900 inmates is 52 years. Many of those he met will die inside, most of old age, but some still in their prime at the hands of the state.

"So many bits of these films are stamped indelibly in my mind. I would go back to my hotel room and lock the door. I had books to read and there were endless acres of awful American TV to watch, and I would find myself stopping and thinking back. I would call up the producer and say, 'Do you remember what that guy said?'"

One conversation chills him. Frederick Baer slit the throats of a 24-year-old woman and her 4-year-old daughter after breaking into their house intent on committing rape. He couldn't go through with the assault, so killed both of them instead. His death row cage - for that is what it is - is covered with pictures of Princess Diana. McDonald was appalled. "I said to him, 'How on earth can you surround yourself with these pictures of somebody who represented such goodness when you think of your dark crime?' He said he had always admired and loved her..."

For nearly an hour McDonald sat on the bed of the handcuffed Baer, hearing him describe his crimes, express his remorse and accept his fate at the hands of the executioner. "To sit there, late at night, in that cell, and to talk to someone about the brutal murder of a woman and her daughter, and the way in which he killed them...you're almost physically ill really. It's probably the most horrendous thing anybody has ever told me."

Did McDonald concur with Baer's view that he deserved to die for what he did? "Well, you couldn't disagree with him." If that encounter sickened McDonald, another troubled him deeply. Ronald L Sanford (right) was just 13 years old when he murdered 2 elderly women after a robbery attempt went horrifically wrong. At the age of 15 he was sentenced to 170 years in prison. Today, 23 years into the sentence that will keep him behind bars for the rest of his life, Sanford is articulate and, apparently, well adjusted. The shelves in his cell groan under the weight of books on everything from eugenics to metaphysics. 4,000 miles away in the cellar of a swanky west London hotel, surrounded by racks of fine wine and vintage port, McDonald ponders the hopelessness of Sanford???s life. Does it make him despair?

"Despair is too mild a word. I am haunted by the idea of a young man at 15 years of age facing up to a sentence of 170 years. As he said himself, he'd never been to a prom, on an aeroplane or been out of the country. He never owned a passport. I can see him in my mind's eye now. I know exactly what he is doing. So you look back on all those wasted years and then you know they go on and on. They will continue, and for him there is no end to it." And did his remorse seem genuine? "I have no way of knowing and no way of doubting. I mean, if you are looking at 170 years, then you would be sorry, wouldn't you?"

Other encounters remain with him, too. "There was a father and his son in there both for murder. We took the father to meet the son, and I can still picture the son walking down to meet his father, and saying rather oddly, 'We see much more of each other now than we ever have.' I thought that was, profoundly, one of the saddest things I have ever heard. Father and son in prison, both for murder, and the son saying he saw more of his father now than he ever did. You wince at that."

There are currently 11 people on death row at Indiana State Prison, though 2009 was the last time a man was executed there. The picture across America shows fewer states exercising their power to take life. Last year, 43 men were put to death - the same as in 2011 - with Texas topping the list with 15 executions. A CNN poll conducted in 2011 showed that a small majority of Americans favoured life sentences instead of the death penalty for murder.

Having sat on death row and seen the prison???s execution suite, McDonald remains opposed to the death penalty. But after listening to stories of child murder, contract killing and police slaying, he understands why capital punishment remains on the statute books of 33 American states.

"When you hear what people did, you understand why Americans feel as they do. It didn't change my mind, but I understood and almost had sympathy with the way they felt. One has to respect the fact that this is a system that would not exist if the American voters didn???t want it. I don't know what the vote would be in this country if you asked people what should happen to whoever killed those 2 police officers in Manchester. It wouldn't surprise me if there were a majority in favour of the death penalty."

How would he vote? "I'm against it. I don't like the idea of the state killing people. But if you try to put yourself in the shoes of somebody who has lost a family member, then emotion crowds out any kind of rational views you may have of it, and I understand that. I hope it wouldn't happen in my case, but I don't know because I have been fortunate not to lose anybody that way. I don't know what I would do."

(source: Radio Times)






OHIO:

Moms who kill: The Nicole Diar caseBy Katherine Cavazini

--Nicole Diar was convicted of killing her 4-year-old son Jacob, then setting her home on fire to cover up the murder

--Diar herself suffered horrific burns in an accident at age 4

--Prosecutors alleged Diar no longer wanted a child, and taking care of Jacob was interfering with her lifestyle


During the early morning hours of August 27, 2003, a fire broke out at the Lorian, Ohio home of 28-year-old mother Nicole Diar. While Diar managed to escape the home unharmed, her 4-year-old son Jacob perished inside.

At the age of 4, Diar herself had suffered horrific burns after her brother accidentally set her pajamas on fire. She underwent a total of 61 operations in just 14 years in an attempt to repair permanent scarring over much of her body.

While it's hard to imagine that a mother - let alone a burn victim - would intentionally start a deadly fire at her home, authorities charged Diar with the aggravated-murder of her son in 2004.

At trial, prosecutors alleged Diar killed her son before the fire started, and she attempted to cover up his death by using gasoline to send her house up in flames.

Discovery of the body

Jacob's severely burned body was found on a bed in a first-floor bedroom. A Lorian firefighter who entered the home a few hours after the fire was extinguished testified at Diar's trial that he smelled gasoline immediately upon entering the home. He also said he noticed obvious burn patterns that led into the bedroom where the child's body was discovered.

Examination of the home

Lee Bethune, a firefighter with the Ohio Fire Marshal's Office, examined the home after the fire. Bethune concluded that the fire was started "by the direct act of a human hand and flame device with an accelerant," according to court documents.

Bethune testified that the bedroom where Jacob's body was found was "targeted with a trail [of gasoline] being poured from the living room to the dining room and into the bedroom," documents state. However, Bethune said he was unable to find a gasoline container, or the remains of one, inside the house or the surrounding area.

Genevieve Bures, a fire investigator hired by Diar's landlord's insurance company, also examined the home and concluded that the "fire was set," and it was not accidental, court documents state.

An electrical expert who examined the wiring, appliances, hot water tank and furnace inside the home testified that there was no electrical failure or malfunction that might have caused or contributed to the fire.

Autopsy results

While Jacob's exact cause of death was never determined due to the fact that his body was so badly burned, Dr. Paul Matus, the Lorian County coroner who conducted the autopsy, determined Jacob died as the result of "homicidal violence," court documents state. Dr. Matus testified Jacob did not die in the fire because his mouth and nasal passages were clear of any soot, foam or debris.

Court documents state Dr. Matus also testified that Jacob's manner of dress at the time of death was "very peculiar and somewhat alarming." Despite the warm weather, Jacob was wearing long pants, a t-shirt and a hooded sweatshirt.

An examiner with the State Fire Marshal Forensic Lab concluded that the hood and underwear Jacob was wearing at the time of his death, as well as the mattress pad he was found on top of, tested positive for the presence of gasoline.

Odd behavior after the fire

The day before Jacob's funeral, a clerk working the drive-through lane at Junction Beverage testified Diar popped her head outside a limousine her brother was driving and said, "I want liquor. Don't forget the liquor," court documents state.

On the evening of the funeral, Diar was seen drinking, singing karaoke, and line dancing at Jack & Diane's Lounge, according to a witness. That same evening, a friend of Diar testified he saw her at a bowling alley drinking and having a good time.

The week after Jacob's death, Diar refused to participate in a candlelight vigil for her son, or pass out flyers to help find the person responsible for her son's death, another friend testified.

Police interrogation

During a videotaped interview with police on September 3, 2003, Diar explained her version of events leading up to the fire.

The night before the fire, Diar gave her son a bath and they fell asleep in the living room, her on the couch and Jacob on a chaise lounge, she told detectives. Diar stated Jacob woke up and asked for some juice at 4:30 a.m.. He went back to sleep on the chaise lounge with his dog, she said.

Between 8:50 and 9:00 a.m. that morning, Diar told detectives she woke up to "black smoke everywhere," according to court documents. Diar said she screamed for her son, but he didn't answer. She went outside and screamed for someone to call 911. Diar told authorities she then went back inside the house to look for Jacob, but the smoke prevented her from going any further.

Diar told investigators she believed the fire was accidental and speculated that her son may have accidentally started it, but she said there was no gasoline in the house.

After investigators confronted Diar with evidence proving Jacob was dead before the fire started, Diar began to cry and said, "I did not harm my son. He was my life," court documents state.

When police suggested Jacob might have died by accident in the bathroom, Diar insisted that didn't happen and denied starting the fire to cover up Jacob's death.

Possible motive

Prosecutors theorized that Diar killed her son because she no longer wanted a child and taking care of Jacob was interfering with her lifestyle.

The state called witnesses to testify that Diar went out on many occasion and left Jacob with different babysitters. One babysitter testified that on a few occasions, Diar called his school, pretended to be his mother, and obtained an excused absence so that he could babysit.

2 other babysitters said that Diar did not leave emergency phone numbers for them to contact her if something happened to Jacob, according to court documents.

A 14-year-old babysitter testified that Diar paid him with cigarettes for watching her son, and she often wouldn't come home until 3:00 or 4:00 a.m.

Another babysitter testified that on three different occasions Diar asked her to give Jacob codeine to help ease his hyperactivity. Diar allegedly said it was "no big deal" when the babysitter told her that medication made Jacob sick, according to court documents.

Defense's case

In an attempt to disprove the state's theory that Diar was an unfit mother, the defense called Diar's sister and friends to testify that she was a loving mother.

Her sister stated Diar was thrilled when she learned she was pregnant with Jacob. She also said Diar was "upset" and appeared to be in shock after learning her son was dead, according to court documents.

Diar didn't hand out flyers seeking the person responsible for her son's death because she was advised by her attorney not to do anything since she was being treated as a suspect, her sister said.

Guy Morton, the pastor at Jacob's funeral, testified that Diar's behavior was typical of someone who had lost a loved one.

Darrell Eberhardt, a family friend, said Diar had a warm and loving relationship with Jacob, and he observed Diar grieving during the funeral service.

Linda Powers, a medical social worker who ran "burn camps" for young burn survivors testified that Diar was a regular participant in camp activities until she was 18 or 19 years old. Powers said Diar loved Jacob and they had a "very caring, very nurturing" mother-son relationship, according to court documents.

Verdict

In October 2004, after just 4 hours of deliberation, a jury found Diar guilty of the aggravated murder of her son. 1 month later, she was sentenced to death.

However, in December 2008, the Ohio Supreme Court overturned Diar's death sentence while upholding her conviction. The court found jurors weren't properly instructed because they should have been advised that any single juror could save Diar's life by refusing to recommend the death penalty, according to documents.

Diar, now 37 years old, is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole at the Ohio Reformatory for Women in Marysville.

HLN reached out to Diar's attorneys who represented her at trial, her appeal and resentencing, but calls were not returned.

(source: HLN TV)

_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/deathpenalty@lists.washlaw.edu/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to