July 7


MISSISSIPPI:

Prison unit unlivable----MDOC chief denies charges


The American Civil Liberties Union and the Mississippi Department of
Corrections are continuing their sparring over allegations of poor
conditions at Unit 32 at the Parchman state penitentiary.

In a June 29 letter to U.S. Magistrate Jerry Davis, ACLU lawyer Margaret
Winter describes Unit 32, which houses about 1,000 maximum-security
inmates including those on death row, as one of the most inhumane in the
country.

The ACLU's National Prison Project sued the state in 2005 over treatment
of prisoners in Unit 32. Conditions of a 2006 settlement had not been met,
the ACLU declared in previous documents filed in the U.S. District Court.

Winter claimed in the letter to Davis that Unit 32 has regressed to the
point where prisoners are living in excrement in darkened cells amid a
"bedlam" of insane fellow inmates.

"Prisoners are being moved into cells without lights, fans, properly
functioning toilets, disinfectant or any other cleaning supplies," the
letter states. "The cells are filthy. Food trays are delivered filthy.
Prisoners have been fed a diet of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for
days."

Corrections Commissioner Chris Epps said he was at the prison on Monday
and the lights are on and cells are being regularly cleaned.

"What the ACLU will do is take what inmates say (as fact). I've never met
an inmate who (said he) was guilty of the crime. Why don't they go to 32
like I did?" Epps said.

"I went to every building, and 32 is doing fine," he said. "This is a
group that is unpleasable. All they are doing is racking up attorney fees
for you and for me (to pay for) in tax dollars."

Winter said the ACLU plans to conduct more regular inspections of the
prison on less notice. According to a 2006 consent decree, the ACLU can
inspect the prison given "proper advance notice." What constitutes
advanced notice is not defined in the agreement.

"We've always given them more than 24 hours notice to give them time to
plan ahead," she said.

There will be less notice from now on, she said.

The ACLU has alleged that mentally ill inmates were sent to Unit 32
because of poor discipline, but a 23-hour-a-day confinement only made them
more insane. The ACLU also alleged physical abuse by guards, poor sanitary
conditions and extreme heat during the summer months.






NEW HAMPSHIRE:

Defense lawyers file 3 more motions challenging death penalty


Lawyers for the man accused of killing a Manchester police officer have
filed 3 more motions challenging the constitutionality of the death
penalty.

The motions field Thursday are the latest in a series of arguments filed
with Hillsborough County Superior Court seeking to bar the imposition of
the death penalty against Michael Addison.

Addison 27, is charged with capital murder in the Oct. 16 death of Officer
Michael Briggs, 35, a father of 2 who was shot while on patrol.

One of the latest motions challenges the aggravating factors prosecutors
have laid out hoping to show why Addison deserves death if convicted.
Addison's lawyers argue that the factors are too broad.

For example, the attorney general's office claims Addison killed Briggs to
avoid a lawful arrest and that he created a "grave risk" to others while
committing the crime. But defense lawyers argue that the terms "lawful
arrest" and "grave risk" are too vague.

"At a minimum, Mr. Addison needs to know how his jury will be instructed
with regard to the aggravators so he can prepare factual defenses," public
defender David Rothstein wrote.

Addison's lawyers also argue that the state's death penalty law gives
greater weight to aggravating factors because jurors consider such factors
before hearing mitigating factors, or reasons why a defendant deserves
life in prison instead of death.

In the third motion, defense lawyers argue that denying capital murder
defendants the choice between a jury trial and a trial before a judge
alone is unconstitutional. A defendant may want a bench trial because he's
concerned that jurors who say they are open to the death penalty may be
more likely to convict, Addison's lawyers said.

The lawyers have until Monday to file more challenges to the death penalty
law. The attorney general's office then will have 30 days to respond. A
hearing is set for Aug. 15.

(source: Boston Globe)






SOUTH DAKOTA----impending execution//volunteer

Clergy, parishioners examine feelings on death penalty


Clergy differ on the death penalty as South Dakota prepares for its 1st
execution in 60 years next week.

25 year-old Elijah Page of Athens, Texas, is to be executed for the 2000
torture slaying of Chester Allan Pogue (POHG) of Spearfish.

Death penalty opponents say capital punishment only draws people into
another cycle of violence.

But some pastors say capital punishment has the sanction of God.

Sioux Falls Seminary professor Paul Rainbow points to passages in both the
Old and New Testament.

Bishop Andrea DeGroot-Nesdahl, bishop of the South Dakota Synod of the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, says she plans to attend a prayer
service in Sioux Falls at the time of Page's execution. The Synod has
passed a resolution against the death penalty.

And South Dakota's two Roman Catholic bishops have issued a statement
describing the execution as an act of violence in which all state
residents are taking part.

(source: Associated Press)

******************

Reaction to Upcoming SD Execution


For the 2nd time in less than a year, Elijah Page is just days from death.

He was sentenced to die after he and 2 other men tortured and killed
Chester Allan Poage in 2000. Last year, Governor Rounds called off the
execution because of a conflict involving the number of drugs being used
to kill Page.

Next week's execution is already causing mixed emotions.

Last year, cheers erupted outside of the South Dakota State Penitentiary
as protestors against the death penalty learned Governor Mike Rounds had
temporarily called off Elijah Page's execution. People supporting the
execution felt he still deserved to die.

And just days away from his 2nd scheduled execution date, there are still
2 sides to the issue.

Sioux Falls resident Grace Thompson says, "I think he did a horrendous
thing and I think he should pay for the crime...I really do."

Grace Thompson and her daughter Christine feel whether Page wants to die
or not, lethal injection should take place.

Christine says, "If this is what he wants, it's not like we're giving him
a gift or something. We're taking his life away and if that's what he
wants and that's what the court decides, then ultimately it's whatever the
court decides."

But others feel life in prison is suffering enough.

Graeme Jannaway who is against the death penalty says, "It's something I
don't think we have any right in taking peoples lives. If the crime is so
horrendous then just keep them away from the rest of us."

And while the law has been changed to correct any potential problems with
the method used to put Page to death, there's still speculation the
Governor may choose to step in again to stop South Dakota's 1st execution
in 60 years.

Thompson says, "If it's legally within his right to stop it and there's a
reason to stop it, then I could see that happening again, I could."

While we know Page is scheduled to die by lethal injection this coming
week, we don't know when exactly it will take place. The warden must
publicly announce the day and time 48 hours in advance.

******************************

Execution Protocol


While we know the execution is scheduled to happen sometime next week, we
still don't know when.

That's because the warden is required to announce the day and hour of the
execution at least 48 hours in advance.

Page is currently on death row in the newer Jamison Annex, but at some
point will be taken to a holding cell at the old death row in the
penitentiary. There he will be allowed visitors.

Immediate family can visit until 6 hours before the scheduled time of
execution. But Page will still be allowed to see his attorney and clergy
until 1 hour before he's killed.

If no last minute appeals are initiated and the Governor has not ordered a
stay of execution, Page will be moved into the execution chamber and
secured to the table. He'll be hooked up to I-V lines and the witnesses
will be brought into the witness rooms.

When the Warden opens the curtains outside the witness rooms, Page has a
chance to make a final statement. A public transcript will be made of that
statement.

After he's given the three drugs, the county coroner will examine Page,
declare his death and the witnesses will be escorted out. A news
conference will then be held at the prison.

(source for both: Keloland TV)

********************

S.D. prepares to execute man who asked for death for killing friend in
2000


Elijah Page will be the 1st inmate executed in South Dakota since 1947 if
his execution proceeds next week.

More than a year since a South Dakota death row inmate asked to be
executed for kidnapping a friend and beating him to death, the admitted
killer may finally get his wish next week when the state carries out its
1st death sentence in 60 years.

Elijah Page sent a letter to the state Supreme Court in spring 2006,
asking to waive his appeals and proceed with the sentence that a judge
handed him in 2001 for the brutal murder of Chester Allan Poage, 19.

Page, who was also 19 at the time, and three co-defendants admitted to
kidnapping Poage on March 12, 2000, so they could steal property from the
Spearfield home he shared with his mother and sister, who were on
vacation.

The men said they forced Poage to drink a mixture of hydrochloric acid,
crushed pills and beer before bringing him out to the snow-covered woods
of rural South Dakota, where they tortured him for nearly three hours and
left him to die.

Though the trio's accounts varied regarding who did what, the group told
police they stabbed Poage, slit his throat, kicked and stoned him in the
head repeatedly before leaving him in a creek, where a passerby discovered
his remains nearly a month later.

After leaving Poage, the group returned to the home he shared with his
mother and sister and stole his PlayStation, stereo equipment and jewelry.

During the week of July 9, in accordance with state law, the warden of the
South Dakota State Penitentiary will announce the exact time and date of
Page's execution no more than 48 hours beforehand.

Page, now 25, was originally scheduled to be executed Aug. 29, 2006. With
just a few hours to spare, his execution was stayed until the legislature
revised the lethal injection protocol.

Earlier this year, the legislature updated the protocol to provide for the
use of a 3-drug cocktail instead of the 2-drug method that was written
into law in 1984, but has never been used.

Additionally, the new statute designates the warden as the official to
determine which substances to use and whether to use a 2- or 3-drug
cocktail.

Because Page and the four other inmates on death row were sentenced before
the revised protocol, they will be able to choose which they prefer.

As the 1st execution since 1947, Page's execution marks a series of
milestones in the short history of capital punishment in South Dakota.

Only 11 others have been put to death since South Dakota entered the Union
in 1889. The most recent execution took place in 1947, when George Sitts
was sent to the electric chair for killing 2 lawmen.

A jury sentenced Darrell Hoadley to life for his part in Poage's slaying.

Until 1992, when Donald Moeller was sentenced to death for the rape and
murder of 9-year-old Becky O'Connell, the state's death row stood vacant
for nearly 3 decades, after the death sentence of a member of the American
Indian Movement was commuted to life.

The relatively low number of death sentences handed down seems consistent
with the low crime rate in South Dakota, where 18 murders occurred in
2005, according to FBI statistics.

"Prosecutors seek the death penalty, but part of it is getting 12 people
to agree on it," said Sara Reburn, public information officer for the
office of South Dakota Attorney General, Larry Long. "They just don't hand
them down very often."

Earlier this year, a Sioux Falls jury spared Daphne Wright a death
sentence for cutting up her deaf lesbian lover with a chainsaw and
spreading her remains throughout the area.

Page, originally from Athens, Texas, will not only be the 1st inmate
executed under the revised statute, he will be the first to undergo lethal
injection.

Page and his co-defendant, Briley Piper, both chose to forgo a jury trial
and instead pleaded guilty to first-degree felony murder, robbery,
kidnapping and grand theft in 2000. A 3rd co-defendant, Darrell Hoadley,
stood trial and was convicted of 1st-degree murder and sentenced to life
in prison by a jury.

After a 5-day hearing, in which Page was portrayed by his lawyers as an
abused child whose parents prostituted him and his sister in exchange for
drugs, a judge sentenced him to death, remarking that he would not want to
see a dog subjected to the treatment Page endured as a child.

In post-sentencing appeals, lawyers for both Page and Piper, 2 of 4
inmates on South Dakota's death row, argued that their sentences were
disproportionate to the punishment Hoadley received for his involvement.
Piper's appeals are still pending.

(source: Court TV)

*******************************

South Dakota executes a tricky life-death dance----Elijah Page and Briley
Piper admitted taking 19-year-old Chester Poage into the snowy remoteness
of western South Dakota, where they plunged him into an icy stream. For
two hours, they taunted and tortured him until he was dead.


Elijah Page and Briley Piper admitted taking 19-year-old Chester Poage
into the snowy remoteness of western South Dakota, where they plunged him
into an icy stream. For 2 hours, they taunted and tortured him until he
was dead.

For their viciousness 6 years ago, they were sentenced to die by lethal
injection, and today they sit on death row at the state prison in Sioux
Falls - the only death row in the 5-state Upper Midwest. As South Dakotans
gird for what may be a protracted and bitterly divisive struggle over
their recently enacted near-total ban on abortion, its neighbors also are
likely to watch with interest as the execution date approaches for one of
Poage's killers.

The South Dakota Supreme Court in January confirmed the death sentences
for Piper, now 25, and Page, 24, and last month Page said he's ready to
accept his punishment and will seek no more delays. A judge set his
execution for August.

If Page is put to death, it would be the state's 1st execution since 1947.
Page would be the 15th person executed in the state since Jack McCall was
hanged in 1877 for shooting Wild Bill Hickock. Dottie Poage, of Rapid
City, the murder victim's mother, wants South Dakota to grant Page's last
wish - to die.

"I'm proud I live in a state that has the death penalty," she said.

Death in Minnesota

Minnesota hasn't had the penalty since 1911, North Dakota since 1930, but
death as a judicial option could take center stage in July when Alfonso
Rodriguez Jr. goes on trial for his life in Fargo, N.D., for the 2003
murder of Dru Sjodin, of Pequot Lakes, Minn.

The case against Rodriguez, a convicted sex offender, is being heard in
federal court - and is subject to the federal penalty - because he is
alleged to have taken Sjodin across state lines and killed her in a
depraved manner. Federal prosecutors have resisted all attempts by
Rodriguez's defense to forestall a potential death penalty in his case.

Richard Ney, a death-penalty specialist from Kansas appointed to aid in
Rodriguez's defense, sought to have the penalty excluded as racially
biased. But U.S. District Judge Ralph Erickson ruled the defense "failed
to prove a racial motive" in the decision to seek death if Rodriguez, who
is Hispanic, is convicted.

In an interview, Ney asserted that the death penalty "is racially skewed.
... It is incredibly expensive and ... fallible," as shown by the freeing
of more than 100 death-row prisoners cleared in recent years by DNA
evidence.

Said Ney, "I don't think society should play God. Even some conservatives
... who talk about the sanctity of life are taking a hard look at their
support for the death penalty."

In adopting the abortion ban last month, the South Dakota Legislature and
Gov. Mike Rounds invoked the state's duty to protect all life. While some
conservatives say they can distinguish between protecting the life of the
innocent unborn and ordering the forfeit of a convicted killer's life,
others do see a contradiction.

Abortion foes "should be consistent and ... care about life after birth,"
said Karl Kroger of Sioux Falls, a member of the Interfaith Task Force
Against the Death Penalty. "If we're going to value life, we need to value
all life, not just the lives we like."

But Larry Long, the state attorney general, said that a 30-year career in
prosecution convinces him that execution "is an appropriate response in
some cases," and South Dakota takes extraordinary steps to ensure that
"only the right people" reach death row.

Rounds could commute Page's sentence. The governor is Catholic, and the
U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops has declared its opposition to the death
penalty. In an interview last week with the Rapid City Journal, the bishop
of the local diocese said he has seen "no hard evidence that there is a
need to take the life of people on death row."

Rounds told the Journal, in an article Sunday, that he agrees "that we
should do everything we can to eliminate the need for the death
sentence..." but "I do not believe there is anything that says the death
sentence is not acceptable today."

One argument that lawyers for Piper and Page made to the state Supreme
Court was that their clients - who pleaded guilty - received harsher terms
than a third man who participated in Poage's killing but fought the
charge. A jury convicted him but sentenced him to life in prison.

In its 3-2 decision upholding the death sentences, the Supreme Court
majority noted that Piper and Page "planned and initiated" the murder.

Reviving death

In a 5-4 decision in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court voided federal and state
capital punishment laws as "arbitrary and capricious" and
unconstitutional. In response, states fine-tuned statutes and capital
punishment resumed in 1977 when convicted killer Gary Gilmore faced a Utah
firing squad. More than 1,000 executions have been carried out since.

National polls have reflected steady support for capital punishment,
though the margin narrows when people have a choice between execution for
convicted murderers or life in prison without parole. When it was put that
way in a Minnesota Poll after Sjodin's disappearance, people split evenly.

Minnesota's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906; the defendant
took more than 14 minutes to die. The public outcry persuaded the
Legislature to abolish the penalty.

Reacting to the Sjodin case, Gov. Tim Pawlenty called on the 2004
Legislature to put capital punishment to the voters, but that stalled and
Minnesota remains one of 12 states without it.

A definition of torture

2 other men sit on South Dakota's death row.

One kidnapped a 9-year-old girl, raped her "and chopped her up," Long
said. The other executed a young man with a knife, nearly beheading him.

Those men deserve to die, Long said. And "if the word `torture' has any
meaning at all, Page and Piper defined it."

Patrick Duffy, Piper's Rapid City attorney, said the two men "were boys
who committed a crime before they were 20 and now are sentenced to be
strapped down in a gurney and put to death." They pleaded guilty, he said,
but "there's not the moral equivalent of cigarette paper" between them and
the 3rd killer.

"We are a state drunk on punishment. We've convinced ourselves we'll be
happier, richer and safer if we gorge ourselves on punishment."

Samantha Poage was 17 when her brother died.

"Sometimes it doesn't seem right that we're putting someone else to
death," she said.

"But they killed my brother. They didn't give my brother an opportunity to
decide whether he lived or died."

(source: Minneapolis Star Tribune)

****************

History of South Dakota's death penalty


- 1877-1882: 4 hangings recorded before statehood.

- 1889: Capital punishment legal at statehood.

- 1892-1913: 10 men hanged.

- 1915: Death penalty abolished.

- 1939: Capital punishment reinstated and 1 execution carried out in 1947
by electrocution, the last on record.

- 1969: Death sentence of Thomas White Hawk commuted.

- 1977: Death penalty abolished after U.S. Supreme Court ruled existing
death penalty laws unconstitutional.

- 1979: Law reinstated and method changed to lethal injection.

- 1993: Charles Rhines sentenced to death.

- 1997: Donald Moeller sentenced to death.

- 1999: Robert Anderson sentenced to death.

- 2000: Elijah Page and Briley Piper sentenced to death.

- 2003: Anderson hangs himself.

- August 2006: Gov. Mike Rounds stops Page's execution because of a
conflict over the number of drugs to be used.

- January-February 2007: Lawmakers change the law to allow prison
officials to choose which drugs to use, Rounds signs bill.

- July 1, 2007: New law takes effect.

- Week of July 9, 2007: Page scheduled to be executed.

(source: Associated Press)






US MILITARY:

Hennis' rape charge may die----Officer: Murder case should go on


A soldier who was pulled back onto active duty after retirement in
connection with a 1985 triple murder case is one step closer to a
court-martial.

A senior officer at Fort Bragg has recommended that Master Sgt. Timothy
Hennis be tried on murder charges but that the Army drop a rape charge
against him, Bragg officials announced Friday.

That recommendation was sent to Lt. Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, the
commander of Fort Bragg and the 18th Airborne Corps, who will make the
final decision. If convicted, Hennis could be sentenced to death again.

He is accused of hacking to death Kathryn Eastburn and her two daughters,
Erin, 3, and Kara, 5, at their Fayetteville home. Eastburn's husband, Air
Force Capt. Gary Eastburn, was in Alabama for training.

Hennis had visited their home a few days earlier to adopt a dog.

He was tried in 1986, convicted and sentenced to death. He spent more than
2 years on death row before his conviction was overturned by the N.C.
Supreme Court, which ruled that the first trial had been poorly handled.
Hennis was acquitted after a second trial, in 1989.

In 2005, Cumberland County investigators asked the State Bureau of
Investigation to use modern DNA analysis techniques on sperm taken from
Eastburn's body. After getting the results, they asked the Army to
court-martial Hennis in order to dodge in a state court any issue of
double jeopardy -- the constitutional protection against being charged
with the same crime after an acquittal.

Hennis' civilian attorney, Colorado-based Frank Spinner, could not be
reached for comment Friday afternoon.

If Austin decides to order Hennis court-martialed, the decision to drop
the rape charge isn't expected to affect the prosecution's case or the
admissibility of its evidence, said Col. Billy Buckner, a spokesman for
Fort Bragg.

That's important because DNA evidence solely retrieved from sperm is the
reason the Army decided to prosecute Hennis.

A DNA expert with the State Bureau of Investigation said at a preliminary
hearing in May that DNA in the samples sent to her office by Cumberland
investigators matched Hennis'.

Hennis' defense team signaled in the hearing that if there is a
court-martial, it would challenge the Army's jurisdiction. His attorneys
also began to attack the chain of control of the evidence in the case over
the past 22 years, portraying it as sloppy. They also claim investigators
and civilian prosecutors are biased against Hennis because of anger over
his acquittal.

The recommendation to drop the rape charge, Buckner said, was based on
military law at the time of the killings. In 1985, the Uniform Code of
Military Justice had a three-year statute of limitations for rape. That
was changed in 1986, but the change was not retroactive, so the three-year
limit applied to the recent rape charge against Hennis.

Austin can accept the recommendations, change them or drop all charges. It
usually takes at least a few weeks for military officials to make such
decisions, but military law does not set a time limit.

(source: News & Observer)




Reply via email to