Sept. 27 VIRGINIA: Va. Execution Is Likely to Be Delayed----State Has Used Lethal Injection 70 Times The Supreme Court's decision to consider whether lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment is likely to delay at least one Virginia execution scheduled for next month, and could have a wide-ranging effect in the state, depending on what the justices decide, lawyers said yesterday. The court announced Tuesday that it would use a Kentucky case to examine the constitutionality of the widely used method of execution, the 1st time it has considered a specific method of executing prisoners in more than a century. There have been 70 executions by lethal injection in Virginia since the mid-1990s. If the court rules that lethal injection is unconstitutional, it would have a dramatic effect on capital punishment in Virginia and across the nation, experts said. But the ruling won't come until next year, possibly as late as June. Although Virginia has 20 inmates on death row, only one has an officially scheduled execution date -- Christopher Scott Emmett, on Oct. 17. Attorneys for Emmett, who beat a man to death with a brass lamp during a robbery in Danville, said yesterday that they will ask Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) to delay the execution in light of the high court's announcement. "I certainly think Mr. Emmett's execution should not go forward before the Supreme Court has had a chance to rule," said Matthew Engle, one of Emmett's attorneys. Kevin Hall, a spokesman for Kaine, said the governor believes that Virginia's method of capital punishment "is constitutional until a court tells us it's not." But he is anticipating that Emmett's lawyers will renew their request for clemency. "The governor will give it the serious consideration it deserves," Hall said. In June, Kaine delayed Emmett's execution until next month because the Supreme Court had not decided whether to hear his appeal. 5 other death row inmates have petitioned Kaine, a Catholic who has said he personally opposes the death penalty, for clemency. He has delayed one other execution, but not granted clemency. "The governor made a commitment to Virginia voters and took an oath to uphold Virginia law," Hall said. "Capital punishment is Virginia law, and he has proven that he has kept his word to Virginians." Death penalty experts said they doubted that Emmett would be put to death before the Supreme Court issues its ruling, predicting that either Kaine or the courts would postpone the execution. "I don't know where the delay will come from, but it's unimaginable that the execution will be carried out while the lethal injection case is pending before the Supreme Court," said Barry Boss, a Washington lawyer who has been involved in numerous death penalty cases. The effect of the Supreme Court announcement will probably be limited to Emmett because other Virginia inmates are not far enough along in the appeals process to be executed before the high court issues its decision, said Robert Lee, executive director of the Virginia Capital Representation Resource Center, which is defending Emmett. Emmett killed co-worker John F. Langley with the lamp after Langley refused to lend him $100 to buy crack cocaine. He confessed to repeatedly hitting Langley on the head in a motel room the 2 were sharing in April 2001, while they did a roofing job. Emmett was sentenced to death by a jury in October 2001. 2 hours before Emmett's scheduled execution by lethal injection in June, Kaine delayed the execution because the Supreme Court had not yet considered the merits of his appeal. "Basic fairness demands that condemned inmates be allowed the opportunity to complete legal appeals prior to execution," the governor said then. The high court is expected to decide soon whether to hear Emmett's appeal, which contends that his former attorney did not provide him with adequate counsel. Emmett has filed a separate challenge to Virginia's proposed method of execution. A federal judge in Richmond said last week that those methods did not constitute cruel or unusual punishment. Virginia inmates can choose to be executed by lethal injection or the electric chair. The last inmate executed in the state was John Yancey Schmitt by lethal injection in November 2006. Emmett has not chosen a method of execution, but under state law inmates who make no choice automatically die by lethal injection. States began using lethal injection in 1978 on the grounds that it was more humane than electrocution or the gas chamber. More than 35 states now use it, but some studies have shown the combination of 3 toxic chemicals can be unreliable, causing inmates to suffer excruciating pain before they die. (source: Washington Post) CALIFORNIA: Morales case most likely to be delayed The case of Michael Morales, who raped and killed a Tokay High School student more than 26 years ago, will likely drag on even longer now that the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a similar case. Morales, 47, remains on death row for the January 1981 death of Terri Lynn Winchell, 17. He was about to be executed in February 2006, when a federal judge decided to review California's lethal injection process and determine if it violates the 8th Amendment of the Constitution, which bars cruel and unusual punishment. On Tuesday, the nation's highest court decided to take up that issue in a Kentucky case, and the ruling could come as late as June. Winchell's mother expects to attend a round of court hearings in December regarding the Morales case, but it was not immediately clear whether the Supreme Court's decision would change that timeline. Barbara Christian continues to wait and said Monday that prolonging executions for years causes more pain for the victims' families. "There is a debt that must be paid. I suggest letting the inmates choose the form of execution they wish to pay this debt," Christian said by e-mail. "None of their victims were able to choose their demise which was very 'cruel and inhuman,' and so is the pain that their families live with." In the meantime, more than 600 inmates await the death penalty in California, home of the nation's largest death row. Despite the halt in executions, San Joaquin County District Attorney Jim Willett said it won't change his office's stance on the death penalty. "There's still a statue in California that allows the death penalty, and we will continue to seek it for the worst of the worst," Willett said. In taking up the lethal injection issue, the Supreme Court could clear up one of the battles involving the death penalty. Defense attorneys wrote in the Kentucky case that almost half of the 76 people who were involuntarily executed in the U.S. between 2006 and 2007 raised the same argument about lethal injection. Each case raised the same question, meaning that judges were basically reinventing the proverbial wheel. Morales' case, for instance, was the 3rd such case U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel had heard. So with Morales, the judge held a full-blown hearing on the lethal injection process, saying he hoped to resolve the matter permanently. Like California, Kentucky uses 3 chemicals in its lethal injection process: sodium thiopental, which makes the inmate unconscious; pancuronium bromide, a paralyzer that stops breathing; and potassium chloride, which causes cardiac arrest. That combination has been challenged in a number of states by inmates who argue there is no way to make sure the sodium thiopental has actually worked before the other, painful drugs start flowing. (source: Lodi News) ********************* Death penalty sought in Temecula murder -- 2 men charged with 2005 slaying during liquor store robbery Prosecutors will seek the death penalty for 2 men charged with the murder of a clerk during an Old Town Temecula liquor store robbery 2 1/2 years ago. Dale Dante Thomas of Temecula and Marcus Fletcher of San Diego, both 23, are charged with the April 1, 2005, murder of Rafi Ibrahim inside Rancho Liquor on Old Town Front Street. Ibrahim, 34, was shot three times in the upper body. The 2 men also face an attempted murder charge as a customer inside the business was shot at, but not hit, prosecutors say. Fletcher is also charged with the Jan. 26, 2005, murder of Kedran Howard in San Diego. Authorities have previously said Howard may have been a rival gang member and that the same gun is believed to have been used in both killings. The decision to seek the death penalty was announced Wednesday and followed a meeting Friday by a panel of more than a dozen experienced prosecutors and District Attorney Rod Pacheco to discuss the details of the two crimes. "To me, personally, the most important thing is that Fletcher killed two people -- both unarmed," Deputy District Attorney John Davis, who is prosecuting the two men, said Wednesday. As for Thomas, Davis said, "he was the mastermind behind the whole (Temecula) robbery." Prosecutors have previously said they believe Fletcher fired the shots that killed Ibrahim, as well as those that killed Howard in San Diego. In an agreement reached with San Diego County prosecutors, the case involving the murder in that county will be tried by prosecutors in Riverside County. When seeking death in a murder case, the prosecution must file what are called special circumstances. In the case of Fletcher and Thomas, there are several. For both men, there is the allegation that Ibrahim's murder happened during the commission of a robbery as well as an allegation that each of them have committed five prior robberies, according to court documents. And Fletcher alone has another special allegation that he committed multiple murders -- Ibrahim and Howard. A new policy instituted recently by Pacheco came into play before the district attorney concluded he would seek death in this case. Not only did the panel of prosecutors meet as they always have, but this time family members of both homicide victims were invited to the meeting, speaking face to face with Pacheco about how the deaths affected them. Davis, a veteran prosecutor who has tried several death penalty cases, said he welcomes the new policy. "We do see the carnage and devastation at crime scenes," Davis said. "But we frequently are not in a position to talk to loved ones, like parents or grandparents." For the most part, Davis said, relatives are not witnesses and aren't heard from until a defendant is about to be sentenced. "It's different to have them sitting with the DA, pouring their hearts out," Davis said. The prosecutor said he was touched by the plight of Ibrahim's parents in this case. "He was their whole support system, from interpreter for them to supporting them financially," Davis said, adding that Ibrahim's parents came to the United States from Iraq and don't speak English. Another relative served as a translator for the couple at the meeting with prosecutors, he said. Not long after Ibrahim was killed, relatives interviewed by The Californian spoke about how he came to America from Iraq less than a year earlier to avoid death, but was killed here. Fletcher and Thomas have their next court appearance early next month. The process of beginning their trial is expected to slow, now that the death penalty paperwork has been filed with the court. Typically when a trial becomes a death-penalty case, new defense attorneys are added, which means they will now have to review all the evidence. Both men have pleaded not guilty to all counts against them and are being held without the possibility of bail. (source: North County Times) WASHINGTON: Spokane Serial Killer's death penalty appeal Thursday Spokane Serial Killer Robert Yates will be learning Thursday whether or not his death penalty conviction for the murders of 2 women near Tacoma will be overturned by the Washington State Supreme Court. Yates, a former Army helicopter pilot who served on active duty and in the National Guard, was convicted in Spokane for the murders of 11 women and sentenced to more than 400 years in prison. After his sentencing in Spokane he faced a second trial in Pierce County and was later convicted for the murders of 2 more women Yates killed near the Army National Guard post at Camp Murray near Fort Lewis. For those murders Yates received the death penalty. Yates was sent to the states death row at Walla Walla State Penitentiary, but appealed his death penalty, claiming the court made 21 different mistakes during his double murder trial in Tacoma. In his 270-page appeal Yates is using a shotgun approach hoping to give the Supreme Court at least one reason to overturn his death sentence. One appeal Yates is making is that he agreed to plead guilty to murders in both Spokane and Tacoma but having made those confessions when he made a plea deal with Spokane County Prosecutor Steve Tucker which took the death penalty off the table. However after he was sentenced in Spokane County he claims that Pierce County prosecutors pulled out of the deal and double-crossed him. Yates was sentenced to death on October 4, 2002 for the 1997 murder of Melinda Mercer and the 1998 murder of Connie LaFontaine Ellis. During the trial in Pierce County his jury was allowed to hear testimony about Yates' role in the deaths of more than a dozen victims in Spokane and Walla Walla Counties which spanned more than 2 decades, and those prior bad acts are typically not admissible. The appeal also challenges the use of an FBI profiler, the qualifications of the jury and whether the murders were part of a common scheme or plan. (source: KXLY News) ****************** High court affirms death sentence for Spokane serial killer The state Supreme Court has upheld the death sentence of convicted serial killer Robert Yates Jr. Yates had asked the high court to throw out his death sentence and take a fresh look at how capital punishment is applied in Washington. In an 8-1 ruling, the high court ruled that his conviction and sentence should stand, rejecting his arguments that Pierce County should not have been able to seek the death penalty after a plea agreement was made with Spokane, and also rejecting his argument that the death penalty is applied in a disproportionate way. A central question was how the so-called Green River killer, Gary Ridgway, could escape the death penalty after pleading guilty to killing 48 women, while less-prolific killers are sentenced to death. Yates was sentenced to 408 years in prison in 2000 after confessing to 13 killings in a plea deal with Spokane County prosecutors that included information on the Pierce County deaths. Pierce County moved separately to charge Yates. He was convicted of killing 2 women in that county and sentenced to death in 2002. In seeking to overturn his Pierce County sentence, Yates' lawyers said he was misled by Spokane County prosecutor Steve Tucker into believing that the two Tacoma-area slayings were part of his Spokane plea agreement. They weren't, Pierce County said. A key part of his appeal is that Yates didn't get the death penalty in Spokane, despite a larger number of victims. "Mr. Yates' [death] sentence is arbitrary, wanton ... freakish and random in light of his Spokane County sentence," his lawyers argued in court documents. The court in April narrowly upheld the death sentence of a man who fatally stabbed his wife and two children. That case also pointed to the disparity with Ridgway's sentence. In that 5-4 case, the court acknowledged the extraordinary circumstances of Ridgway's case but said no matter how unfair it may seem, his plea deal does not automatically invalidate the state's death penalty for everyone else. Yates, an aluminum-smelter worker and Air National Guard helicopter pilot, was arrested in Spokane in April 2000 after years of unsolved deaths of local women, many of whom were prostitutes. Within weeks of his arrest, Yates' public defender was trying for a plea agreement with Tucker. Through the lawyer, Yates started revealing information about his victims and his crimes. Tucker has repeatedly said he thought he had then-Pierce County prosecutor John Ladenburg's permission to include the 2 Pierce County cases in the plea deal. Ladenburg has said he told Tucker in a conference call that a plea deal was "ill-considered and premature" and to leave the Pierce County cases out of any deal that didn't include the death penalty. Tucker said he has no recollection of Ladenburg saying that. Shortly after Tucker sent the proposed plea deal to Ladenburg, Yates was charged with the Pierce County homicides. (source: Associated Press) NORTH CAROLINA: Judge: Hayes must remain in state care Michael Hayes, who killed 4 people and wounded 5 others in a 1988 shooting spree in southern Forsyth County, must remain in the care of a state psychiatric hospital, a judge ruled today. The ruling, which was not immediately available, comes after a 4-day hearing in Forsyth Superior Court last week in which a team of psychologists testified that Hayes no longer suffers from the personality disorder that accounted for his murderous rampage. A jury found him not guilty by reason of insanity in the killings. Special Judge Steve A. Balog could have either released Hayes, 43, without any conditions, or ordered him back to Dorothea Dix Hospital. Hayes' attorney, Karl Knudsen, had to persuade Balog that Hayes met 1 of 2 conditions for release: That he is not mentally ill, or that he is no longer dangerous to others. Knudsen said in his closing argument that it's hard to see how Hayes could do more to satisfy both parts of the law. "We have a situation where the law compels the court to make a decision which may be unpopular, which may be difficult, but it's the right thing to do," Knudsen said. David Sipprell, an assistant district attorney, told Balog that he should not believe that Hayes has recovered from the personality disorders and drug dependencies that led Hayes to kill. Robert Brown Jr., the only psychiatrist called by the state, testified that Hayes still has an unspecified personality disorder. He said he recommended that Hayes be released with conditions, an arrangement that is not possible under state law. During the hearing, Hayes apologized for the shootings. "It was totally me, my life choices, my bad decisions led me to do something like that to you and your family," he said. "I wish I could change it, I wish I could take the whole thing back. But there is not a day that goes by that I do not think about you. You're all in my prayers, everyone. I mean, I'm very, very sorry. (source: Winston-Salem Journal) DELAWARE: Delaware death penalty class action trial put on hold A class action that alleges Delaware's system of capital punishment constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment" was to go to trial in federal court, but that trial has been put on hold today because the U.S. Supreme Court is taking up the issue. The Supreme Court will consider whether the most common method of lethal injection -- the use of three drugs to sedate, relax and kill someone -- violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices agreed Tuesday to hear a challenge to the practice from two inmates on death row in Kentucky -- Ralph Baze and Thomas Clyde Bowling Jr. All executions in Delaware have been placed on hold since a federal lawsuit was filed more than a year ago to stop the execution of Robert W. Jackson, who was convicted of murdering 47-year-old Elizabeth Girardi with an ax in 1992 during a robbery in Hockessin. Earlier this year, District Judge Sue L. Robinson changed the case to a class action, including everybody on Delaware's death row. In Jackson's appeal, attorneys argue that the chemicals used by Delaware and the apparent lack of training for those carrying out the execution means lethal injection -- as performed by the state -- would violate the standard of care used by veterinarians to put down animals. Instead of a quick and humane death, they claim, Jackson could die a slow, lingering death by suffocation. The last execution in Delaware was the Nov. 4, 2005, lethal injection of Brian Steckel, who raped, beat and killed Sandra Lee Long in 1994. (source: The News Journal)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----VA., CALIF., WASH., N.C., DEL.
Rick Halperin Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:28:27 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)